Allow serverless lambda to be called by cloud watch2019 Community Moderator ElectionAWS Cloudwatch Event putTargets not adding Lambda event sourcesHow do I pass json inputs to a Cron scheduled Lambda deployed in Serverless using event?AWS SDK can't add Lambda as target to Cloudwatch eventNeed to configure serverless resource output to get api gateway api idServerless Framework: ways to achieve full “infrastructure as code”?Destroy resources created via Serverless without destroying Lambda endpointsserverless framework: trying to define a role for a lambda gives an undefined resource errorAWS Lambda Policy Length Exceeded - adding rules to a lambda functionWhat is causing Serverless deploy error: Unable to validate the following destination configurations, S3 InvalidArgument?Cognito permission to lambda function using serverless framework

Can one live in the U.S. and not use a credit card?

Coax or bifilar choke

PTIJ: Should I kill my computer after installing software?

Why doesn't this Google Translate ad use the word "Translation" instead of "Translate"?

What would be the most expensive material to an intergalactic society?

What is Earthy controling in the ISS cupola?

When a wind turbine does not produce enough electricity how does the power company compensate for the loss?

Signed and unsigned numbers

How strictly should I take "Candidates must be local"?

bad quality map when exporting as PDF

When traveling to Europe from North America, do I need to purchase a different power strip?

Should I tell my boss the work he did was worthless

Single word request: Harming the benefactor

Has a sovereign Communist government ever run, and conceded loss, on a fair election?

meaning and function of 幸 in "则幸分我一杯羹"

If I receive a SOS signal, what is the proper response?

Marriage green card at end of current visa with 2 Year residency requirement waiver in-process, question

Is "history" a male-biased word ("his+story")?

Latex does not go to next line

Database Backup for data and log files

Can I pump my MTB tire to max (55 psi / 380 kPa) without the tube inside bursting?

Are there historical instances of the capital of a colonising country being temporarily or permanently shifted to one of its colonies?

Conservation of Mass and Energy

Expressing logarithmic equations without logs



Allow serverless lambda to be called by cloud watch



2019 Community Moderator ElectionAWS Cloudwatch Event putTargets not adding Lambda event sourcesHow do I pass json inputs to a Cron scheduled Lambda deployed in Serverless using event?AWS SDK can't add Lambda as target to Cloudwatch eventNeed to configure serverless resource output to get api gateway api idServerless Framework: ways to achieve full “infrastructure as code”?Destroy resources created via Serverless without destroying Lambda endpointsserverless framework: trying to define a role for a lambda gives an undefined resource errorAWS Lambda Policy Length Exceeded - adding rules to a lambda functionWhat is causing Serverless deploy error: Unable to validate the following destination configurations, S3 InvalidArgument?Cognito permission to lambda function using serverless framework










0















I have one lambda function within my serverless.yml. It looks somehow like this:



functions:
clean:
handler: app.run
events:
- schedule: rate(2 hours)


It works pretty well and out of the box lambda gets called every 2 hours. When I add new rule in AWS Console and sets the newly created lambda as a target it also works. Both AWS Console and Serverless framework creates on the background policy that events.amazonaws.com service can invoke this specific function. The policy looks somehow like this:




"Sid":"AWSEvents_rule_name_test",
"Effect":"Allow",
"Principal":
"Service":"events.amazonaws.com"
,
"Action":"lambda:InvokeFunction",
"Resource":"arn:aws:lambda:eu-central-1:<account_id>:function:<lambda_name>",
"Condition":
"ArnLike":
"AWS:SourceArn":"arn:aws:events:eu-central-1:<account_id>:rule/<rule_name>"






I would like to define rules programatically and without the need to maintain those permissions. What I do is I create rule, then I create target similarly as described in docs https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudWatch/latest/events/RunLambdaSchedule.html. Without the permission step it doesnt work. I would like to have generic permission on the serverless.yml level that enables the lambda to be called by any existing or not yet existing rules (so I care only about rules and targets). I mean something that would say:
"Grant cloud watch permission to invoke any lambda function with any rule defined on my account". That would increase usability of my function alot more.



Is it possible to define same policy that gets usually generated by AWS Console (code above) but little more generic and within serverless.yml file?



Update:
I end up trying example bellow. It was supposed to create "generic" rule:



functions:
clean:
handler: app.run
events:
- schedule: rate(2 hours)
resources:
Resources:
cleanLambdaPermission:
DependsOn:
# This is how serverless converts function name. Has to be update accordingly when lambda gets renamed.
- cleanLambdaFunction
Type: AWS::Lambda::Permission
Properties:
FunctionName:
"Fn::GetAtt": [ cleanLambdaFunction, Arn ]
Action: "lambda:InvokeFunction"
Principal: "events.amazonaws.com"
SourceArn: "arn:aws:events:eu-central-1:<account_id>:rule"



Though it showed up it didnt work and my lambda never got called by programatically created rules until I added explicit SourceArn that maps exactly one rule to one single specific function. I am doing it also programatically in three steps:
1. Create rule.
2. Create target.
3. Create permission.



For delete I need proceed in reverse order. I didnt find if this (not allowing wildcards) is bug or intentional behaviour.










share|improve this question




























    0















    I have one lambda function within my serverless.yml. It looks somehow like this:



    functions:
    clean:
    handler: app.run
    events:
    - schedule: rate(2 hours)


    It works pretty well and out of the box lambda gets called every 2 hours. When I add new rule in AWS Console and sets the newly created lambda as a target it also works. Both AWS Console and Serverless framework creates on the background policy that events.amazonaws.com service can invoke this specific function. The policy looks somehow like this:




    "Sid":"AWSEvents_rule_name_test",
    "Effect":"Allow",
    "Principal":
    "Service":"events.amazonaws.com"
    ,
    "Action":"lambda:InvokeFunction",
    "Resource":"arn:aws:lambda:eu-central-1:<account_id>:function:<lambda_name>",
    "Condition":
    "ArnLike":
    "AWS:SourceArn":"arn:aws:events:eu-central-1:<account_id>:rule/<rule_name>"






    I would like to define rules programatically and without the need to maintain those permissions. What I do is I create rule, then I create target similarly as described in docs https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudWatch/latest/events/RunLambdaSchedule.html. Without the permission step it doesnt work. I would like to have generic permission on the serverless.yml level that enables the lambda to be called by any existing or not yet existing rules (so I care only about rules and targets). I mean something that would say:
    "Grant cloud watch permission to invoke any lambda function with any rule defined on my account". That would increase usability of my function alot more.



    Is it possible to define same policy that gets usually generated by AWS Console (code above) but little more generic and within serverless.yml file?



    Update:
    I end up trying example bellow. It was supposed to create "generic" rule:



    functions:
    clean:
    handler: app.run
    events:
    - schedule: rate(2 hours)
    resources:
    Resources:
    cleanLambdaPermission:
    DependsOn:
    # This is how serverless converts function name. Has to be update accordingly when lambda gets renamed.
    - cleanLambdaFunction
    Type: AWS::Lambda::Permission
    Properties:
    FunctionName:
    "Fn::GetAtt": [ cleanLambdaFunction, Arn ]
    Action: "lambda:InvokeFunction"
    Principal: "events.amazonaws.com"
    SourceArn: "arn:aws:events:eu-central-1:<account_id>:rule"



    Though it showed up it didnt work and my lambda never got called by programatically created rules until I added explicit SourceArn that maps exactly one rule to one single specific function. I am doing it also programatically in three steps:
    1. Create rule.
    2. Create target.
    3. Create permission.



    For delete I need proceed in reverse order. I didnt find if this (not allowing wildcards) is bug or intentional behaviour.










    share|improve this question


























      0












      0








      0








      I have one lambda function within my serverless.yml. It looks somehow like this:



      functions:
      clean:
      handler: app.run
      events:
      - schedule: rate(2 hours)


      It works pretty well and out of the box lambda gets called every 2 hours. When I add new rule in AWS Console and sets the newly created lambda as a target it also works. Both AWS Console and Serverless framework creates on the background policy that events.amazonaws.com service can invoke this specific function. The policy looks somehow like this:




      "Sid":"AWSEvents_rule_name_test",
      "Effect":"Allow",
      "Principal":
      "Service":"events.amazonaws.com"
      ,
      "Action":"lambda:InvokeFunction",
      "Resource":"arn:aws:lambda:eu-central-1:<account_id>:function:<lambda_name>",
      "Condition":
      "ArnLike":
      "AWS:SourceArn":"arn:aws:events:eu-central-1:<account_id>:rule/<rule_name>"






      I would like to define rules programatically and without the need to maintain those permissions. What I do is I create rule, then I create target similarly as described in docs https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudWatch/latest/events/RunLambdaSchedule.html. Without the permission step it doesnt work. I would like to have generic permission on the serverless.yml level that enables the lambda to be called by any existing or not yet existing rules (so I care only about rules and targets). I mean something that would say:
      "Grant cloud watch permission to invoke any lambda function with any rule defined on my account". That would increase usability of my function alot more.



      Is it possible to define same policy that gets usually generated by AWS Console (code above) but little more generic and within serverless.yml file?



      Update:
      I end up trying example bellow. It was supposed to create "generic" rule:



      functions:
      clean:
      handler: app.run
      events:
      - schedule: rate(2 hours)
      resources:
      Resources:
      cleanLambdaPermission:
      DependsOn:
      # This is how serverless converts function name. Has to be update accordingly when lambda gets renamed.
      - cleanLambdaFunction
      Type: AWS::Lambda::Permission
      Properties:
      FunctionName:
      "Fn::GetAtt": [ cleanLambdaFunction, Arn ]
      Action: "lambda:InvokeFunction"
      Principal: "events.amazonaws.com"
      SourceArn: "arn:aws:events:eu-central-1:<account_id>:rule"



      Though it showed up it didnt work and my lambda never got called by programatically created rules until I added explicit SourceArn that maps exactly one rule to one single specific function. I am doing it also programatically in three steps:
      1. Create rule.
      2. Create target.
      3. Create permission.



      For delete I need proceed in reverse order. I didnt find if this (not allowing wildcards) is bug or intentional behaviour.










      share|improve this question
















      I have one lambda function within my serverless.yml. It looks somehow like this:



      functions:
      clean:
      handler: app.run
      events:
      - schedule: rate(2 hours)


      It works pretty well and out of the box lambda gets called every 2 hours. When I add new rule in AWS Console and sets the newly created lambda as a target it also works. Both AWS Console and Serverless framework creates on the background policy that events.amazonaws.com service can invoke this specific function. The policy looks somehow like this:




      "Sid":"AWSEvents_rule_name_test",
      "Effect":"Allow",
      "Principal":
      "Service":"events.amazonaws.com"
      ,
      "Action":"lambda:InvokeFunction",
      "Resource":"arn:aws:lambda:eu-central-1:<account_id>:function:<lambda_name>",
      "Condition":
      "ArnLike":
      "AWS:SourceArn":"arn:aws:events:eu-central-1:<account_id>:rule/<rule_name>"






      I would like to define rules programatically and without the need to maintain those permissions. What I do is I create rule, then I create target similarly as described in docs https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudWatch/latest/events/RunLambdaSchedule.html. Without the permission step it doesnt work. I would like to have generic permission on the serverless.yml level that enables the lambda to be called by any existing or not yet existing rules (so I care only about rules and targets). I mean something that would say:
      "Grant cloud watch permission to invoke any lambda function with any rule defined on my account". That would increase usability of my function alot more.



      Is it possible to define same policy that gets usually generated by AWS Console (code above) but little more generic and within serverless.yml file?



      Update:
      I end up trying example bellow. It was supposed to create "generic" rule:



      functions:
      clean:
      handler: app.run
      events:
      - schedule: rate(2 hours)
      resources:
      Resources:
      cleanLambdaPermission:
      DependsOn:
      # This is how serverless converts function name. Has to be update accordingly when lambda gets renamed.
      - cleanLambdaFunction
      Type: AWS::Lambda::Permission
      Properties:
      FunctionName:
      "Fn::GetAtt": [ cleanLambdaFunction, Arn ]
      Action: "lambda:InvokeFunction"
      Principal: "events.amazonaws.com"
      SourceArn: "arn:aws:events:eu-central-1:<account_id>:rule"



      Though it showed up it didnt work and my lambda never got called by programatically created rules until I added explicit SourceArn that maps exactly one rule to one single specific function. I am doing it also programatically in three steps:
      1. Create rule.
      2. Create target.
      3. Create permission.



      For delete I need proceed in reverse order. I didnt find if this (not allowing wildcards) is bug or intentional behaviour.







      aws-lambda serverless-framework aws-serverless






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Mar 7 at 13:56







      svobol13

















      asked Mar 6 at 15:15









      svobol13svobol13

      8451424




      8451424






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          Yes, You can use wild cards '*' to make it generic.






          share|improve this answer






















            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            );
            );
            , "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55026399%2fallow-serverless-lambda-to-be-called-by-cloud-watch%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            Yes, You can use wild cards '*' to make it generic.






            share|improve this answer



























              0














              Yes, You can use wild cards '*' to make it generic.






              share|improve this answer

























                0












                0








                0







                Yes, You can use wild cards '*' to make it generic.






                share|improve this answer













                Yes, You can use wild cards '*' to make it generic.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Mar 7 at 1:28









                Sudhakar NaiduSudhakar Naidu

                616




                616





























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55026399%2fallow-serverless-lambda-to-be-called-by-cloud-watch%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    AWS Lex not identifying response if by a variable The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) The Ask Question Wizard is Live! Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experienceEnforcing custom enumeration in AWS LEX for slot valuesHow to give response based on user response in Amazon Lex?Intercepting AWS Lambda Response to a AWS Lex QueryLex chat bot error: Reached second execution of fulfillment lambda on the same utteranceamazon lex showing invalid responseLambda response send back to Lex slot?Response card in Amazon lexAmazon Lex - Lambda response return HTML to botHow can I solve 424 (Failed Dependency) (python) obtained from Amazon lex?

                    Алба-Юлія

                    Захаров Федір Захарович