Select top three pairs of numbers that appear grouped together in oracle db2019 Community Moderator ElectionHow do I limit the number of rows returned by an Oracle query after ordering?Oracle SELECT TOP 10 recordsHow do I do top 1 in Oracle?Numbering of groups in select (Oracle)Oracle subqueries with Join - how to refer to subquery column?Combining two tuples into one in oracle dbOracle ListaGG, Top 3 most frequent values, given in one column, grouped by IDSQL Select Query with Join: How to Count a Certain Number of Occurences on non-primary Attribute without a Foreign KeyCombine three queries' results and use them in one another querySubquery with TOP 1 returns more than one row in Oracle NetSuite

Decoding assembly instructions in a Game Boy disassembler

Plywood subfloor won't screw down in a trailer home

Latest web browser compatible with Windows 98

Running a subshell from the middle of the current command

Should QA ask requirements to developers?

Co-worker team leader wants to inject the crap software product of his friends into our development. What should I say to our common boss?

Is it illegal in Germany to take sick leave if you caused your own illness with food?

Why would a jet engine that runs at temps excess of 2000°C burn when it crashes?

Want to switch to tankless, but can I use my existing wiring?

What does it mean when multiple 々 marks follow a 、?

Do I need to leave some extra space available on the disk which my database log files reside, for log backup operations to successfully occur?

My story is written in English, but is set in my home country. What language should I use for the dialogue?

How could a female member of a species produce eggs unto death?

Who is our nearest neighbor

Rejected in 4th interview round citing insufficient years of experience

When two POV characters meet

Excess Zinc in garden soil

Provisioning profile doesn't include the application-identifier and keychain-access-groups entitlements

Can "semicircle" be used to refer to a part-circle that is not a exact half-circle?

Humans have energy, but not water. What happens?

Is going from continuous data to categorical always wrong?

Does Linux have system calls to access all the features of the file systems it supports?

validation vs test vs training accuracy, which one to compare for claiming overfit?

Is all copper pipe pretty much the same?



Select top three pairs of numbers that appear grouped together in oracle db



2019 Community Moderator ElectionHow do I limit the number of rows returned by an Oracle query after ordering?Oracle SELECT TOP 10 recordsHow do I do top 1 in Oracle?Numbering of groups in select (Oracle)Oracle subqueries with Join - how to refer to subquery column?Combining two tuples into one in oracle dbOracle ListaGG, Top 3 most frequent values, given in one column, grouped by IDSQL Select Query with Join: How to Count a Certain Number of Occurences on non-primary Attribute without a Foreign KeyCombine three queries' results and use them in one another querySubquery with TOP 1 returns more than one row in Oracle NetSuite










-1















Given a table A, columns in the following order (item_id, order_id, product_id) set up like so:



1 1 2
2 2 4
3 3 3
4 3 6
5 4 2
6 5 5
7 6 5
8 7 1
9 7 7
10 7 9
11 8 10
12 9 1
13 5 7
14 7 5
15 6 7
16 1 1
17 4 1
18 8 3
19 3 10


Select the top three pairs of product_ids with same order_id using only oracle sql. I have tried self joins, subqueries and everything else but cannot seem to get anything working... If someone can get this you will be my programming idol.



So the output would be



Most occurred pair: 7 and 5 because they occur together three times second most occurred: 3,10 because they occur together twice third most occurred: 1,2 because they occur together twice



So, logically, going down the list when order_id = 1 the product_ids = 1 and 2 (so one occurrence) they occur together again when order_id = 4 When order_id = 5,6, or 7 they have 5 and 7 as product_id's so they occur 3 times... and so on










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    Please give sample output for the above data

    – Utsav
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:18






  • 2





    What does "top three pairs of product_ids with same order_id " even mean? Can you show the required output for this input and explain how you got it?

    – Mureinik
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:20











  • We can see that in your requirement. What we need is your expected output with data. top three pairs of product_ids with same order_id doesn't make any sense

    – Utsav
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:34











  • Top three pairs ascending or descending?

    – RubahMalam
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:36











  • RubahMalam doesn't matter if they are ascending or descending

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:42















-1















Given a table A, columns in the following order (item_id, order_id, product_id) set up like so:



1 1 2
2 2 4
3 3 3
4 3 6
5 4 2
6 5 5
7 6 5
8 7 1
9 7 7
10 7 9
11 8 10
12 9 1
13 5 7
14 7 5
15 6 7
16 1 1
17 4 1
18 8 3
19 3 10


Select the top three pairs of product_ids with same order_id using only oracle sql. I have tried self joins, subqueries and everything else but cannot seem to get anything working... If someone can get this you will be my programming idol.



So the output would be



Most occurred pair: 7 and 5 because they occur together three times second most occurred: 3,10 because they occur together twice third most occurred: 1,2 because they occur together twice



So, logically, going down the list when order_id = 1 the product_ids = 1 and 2 (so one occurrence) they occur together again when order_id = 4 When order_id = 5,6, or 7 they have 5 and 7 as product_id's so they occur 3 times... and so on










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    Please give sample output for the above data

    – Utsav
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:18






  • 2





    What does "top three pairs of product_ids with same order_id " even mean? Can you show the required output for this input and explain how you got it?

    – Mureinik
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:20











  • We can see that in your requirement. What we need is your expected output with data. top three pairs of product_ids with same order_id doesn't make any sense

    – Utsav
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:34











  • Top three pairs ascending or descending?

    – RubahMalam
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:36











  • RubahMalam doesn't matter if they are ascending or descending

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:42













-1












-1








-1








Given a table A, columns in the following order (item_id, order_id, product_id) set up like so:



1 1 2
2 2 4
3 3 3
4 3 6
5 4 2
6 5 5
7 6 5
8 7 1
9 7 7
10 7 9
11 8 10
12 9 1
13 5 7
14 7 5
15 6 7
16 1 1
17 4 1
18 8 3
19 3 10


Select the top three pairs of product_ids with same order_id using only oracle sql. I have tried self joins, subqueries and everything else but cannot seem to get anything working... If someone can get this you will be my programming idol.



So the output would be



Most occurred pair: 7 and 5 because they occur together three times second most occurred: 3,10 because they occur together twice third most occurred: 1,2 because they occur together twice



So, logically, going down the list when order_id = 1 the product_ids = 1 and 2 (so one occurrence) they occur together again when order_id = 4 When order_id = 5,6, or 7 they have 5 and 7 as product_id's so they occur 3 times... and so on










share|improve this question
















Given a table A, columns in the following order (item_id, order_id, product_id) set up like so:



1 1 2
2 2 4
3 3 3
4 3 6
5 4 2
6 5 5
7 6 5
8 7 1
9 7 7
10 7 9
11 8 10
12 9 1
13 5 7
14 7 5
15 6 7
16 1 1
17 4 1
18 8 3
19 3 10


Select the top three pairs of product_ids with same order_id using only oracle sql. I have tried self joins, subqueries and everything else but cannot seem to get anything working... If someone can get this you will be my programming idol.



So the output would be



Most occurred pair: 7 and 5 because they occur together three times second most occurred: 3,10 because they occur together twice third most occurred: 1,2 because they occur together twice



So, logically, going down the list when order_id = 1 the product_ids = 1 and 2 (so one occurrence) they occur together again when order_id = 4 When order_id = 5,6, or 7 they have 5 and 7 as product_id's so they occur 3 times... and so on







database oracle






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 6 at 17:36









Brian Tompsett - 汤莱恩

4,2421338102




4,2421338102










asked Sep 29 '15 at 7:15









user2942951user2942951

32




32







  • 1





    Please give sample output for the above data

    – Utsav
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:18






  • 2





    What does "top three pairs of product_ids with same order_id " even mean? Can you show the required output for this input and explain how you got it?

    – Mureinik
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:20











  • We can see that in your requirement. What we need is your expected output with data. top three pairs of product_ids with same order_id doesn't make any sense

    – Utsav
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:34











  • Top three pairs ascending or descending?

    – RubahMalam
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:36











  • RubahMalam doesn't matter if they are ascending or descending

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:42












  • 1





    Please give sample output for the above data

    – Utsav
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:18






  • 2





    What does "top three pairs of product_ids with same order_id " even mean? Can you show the required output for this input and explain how you got it?

    – Mureinik
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:20











  • We can see that in your requirement. What we need is your expected output with data. top three pairs of product_ids with same order_id doesn't make any sense

    – Utsav
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:34











  • Top three pairs ascending or descending?

    – RubahMalam
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:36











  • RubahMalam doesn't matter if they are ascending or descending

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:42







1




1





Please give sample output for the above data

– Utsav
Sep 29 '15 at 7:18





Please give sample output for the above data

– Utsav
Sep 29 '15 at 7:18




2




2





What does "top three pairs of product_ids with same order_id " even mean? Can you show the required output for this input and explain how you got it?

– Mureinik
Sep 29 '15 at 7:20





What does "top three pairs of product_ids with same order_id " even mean? Can you show the required output for this input and explain how you got it?

– Mureinik
Sep 29 '15 at 7:20













We can see that in your requirement. What we need is your expected output with data. top three pairs of product_ids with same order_id doesn't make any sense

– Utsav
Sep 29 '15 at 7:34





We can see that in your requirement. What we need is your expected output with data. top three pairs of product_ids with same order_id doesn't make any sense

– Utsav
Sep 29 '15 at 7:34













Top three pairs ascending or descending?

– RubahMalam
Sep 29 '15 at 7:36





Top three pairs ascending or descending?

– RubahMalam
Sep 29 '15 at 7:36













RubahMalam doesn't matter if they are ascending or descending

– user2942951
Sep 29 '15 at 7:42





RubahMalam doesn't matter if they are ascending or descending

– user2942951
Sep 29 '15 at 7:42












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















0














Two different queries (one hierarchical and the other with a self join) - both give the same answer (go for whichever is more performant):



SQL Fiddle



Oracle 11g R2 Schema Setup:



CREATE TABLE A (item_id, order_id, product_id) AS
SELECT 1, 1, 2 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 2, 2, 4 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 3, 3, 3 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 4, 3, 6 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 5, 4, 2 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 6, 5, 5 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 7, 6, 5 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 8, 7, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 9, 7, 7 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 10, 7, 9 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 11, 8, 10 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 12, 9, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 13, 5, 7 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 14, 7, 5 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 15, 6, 7 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 16, 1, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 17, 4, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 18, 8, 3 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 19, 3, 10 FROM DUAL


Query 1:



SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT lower_product_id,
upper_product_id,
COUNT(1) AS frequency,
LISTAGG( order_id, ', ' ) WITHIN GROUP ( ORDER BY order_id ) AS order_ids
FROM (
SELECT order_id,
lower_product_id,
upper_product_id
FROM (
SELECT order_id,
PRIOR product_id AS lower_product_id,
product_id AS upper_product_id,
LEVEL AS lvl
FROM A
CONNECT BY
PRIOR order_id = order_id
AND PRIOR product_id < product_id
)
WHERE lvl = 2
)
GROUP BY lower_product_id, upper_product_id
ORDER BY frequency DESC, lower_product_id, upper_product_id
)
WHERE ROWNUM <= 3


Results:



| LOWER_PRODUCT_ID | UPPER_PRODUCT_ID | FREQUENCY | ORDER_IDS |
|------------------|------------------|-----------|-----------|
| 5 | 7 | 3 | 5, 6, 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 1, 4 |
| 3 | 10 | 2 | 3, 8 |


Query 2:



SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT A.product_id AS lower_product_id,
B.product_id AS upper_product_id,
COUNT(1) AS frequency,
LISTAGG( A.order_id, ', ' ) WITHIN GROUP ( ORDER BY A.order_id ) AS order_ids
FROM A
INNER JOIN A B
ON ( A.order_id = B.order_id
AND A.product_id < B.product_id )
GROUP BY A.product_id, B.product_id
ORDER BY frequency DESC, lower_product_id, upper_product_id
)
WHERE ROWNUM <= 3


Results:



| LOWER_PRODUCT_ID | UPPER_PRODUCT_ID | FREQUENCY | ORDER_IDS |
|------------------|------------------|-----------|-----------|
| 5 | 7 | 3 | 5, 6, 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 1, 4 |
| 3 | 10 | 2 | 3, 8 |





share|improve this answer

























  • Damn.... You are good

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 10:14


















0














This could be what you want :



select item_id,order_id,product_id,
(case when order_id = product_id then 'Yes' else 'No' end) as pairs
from tableA
having pairs = 'Yes'
order by order_id asc
limit 3


or without using HAVING clause



select item_id,order_id,product_id
from tableA
where order_id = product_id
order by order_id asc
limit 3





share|improve this answer

























  • Think of it as consolidating the table into order_id's being unique... So when order_id = 1 all the product_id values are 1 and 2 so that is one occurrence of 1 and 2. When you consolidate order_id = 5 the product_id's would be 5 and 7 so that is one occurrence of 5 and 7. That make more sense?

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:58











  • @user2942951 Yes, I was missunderstood your question. Why don't put desired output in question instead of put them in comment?

    – RubahMalam
    Sep 29 '15 at 8:04


















0














If that's what you want to achieve,you can try this:



 select product_id,myranking from 
(select product_id, dense_rank() over(order by mycount desc) myranking from
(select product_id,count(*) over (partition by product_id) mycount from mytable))
where myranking<4 group by product_id,myranking


the output will be order_id with the most occurences at the product_id column and its rank






share|improve this answer

























  • This is close but not order_id and item_id pair. You want the top three occurring pairs of product_id's.

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:54











  • @user2942951 I updated my answer :)

    – Vance
    Sep 29 '15 at 9:20











  • Wow you are so close!!! But two things: 1. The query you wrote returns product_id = 2 as having counted 3 of them when only 2 is given. 2. You have to find a way to only count the product_id occurrence if it shows up with the other number (for example: you count product_id occurrence even if it isn't with its other pair. Think of the pair that share order_id as a single count of that pair not as individuals) Keep trying you are on the verge!! :D

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 9:54












  • and when product_id =1 you return 1 but it should return 2(product_id = 2 occurs 4 times but its highest pair is with 2 and theyoccur together 2times

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 10:00










Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f32837892%2fselect-top-three-pairs-of-numbers-that-appear-grouped-together-in-oracle-db%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














Two different queries (one hierarchical and the other with a self join) - both give the same answer (go for whichever is more performant):



SQL Fiddle



Oracle 11g R2 Schema Setup:



CREATE TABLE A (item_id, order_id, product_id) AS
SELECT 1, 1, 2 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 2, 2, 4 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 3, 3, 3 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 4, 3, 6 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 5, 4, 2 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 6, 5, 5 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 7, 6, 5 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 8, 7, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 9, 7, 7 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 10, 7, 9 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 11, 8, 10 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 12, 9, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 13, 5, 7 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 14, 7, 5 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 15, 6, 7 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 16, 1, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 17, 4, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 18, 8, 3 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 19, 3, 10 FROM DUAL


Query 1:



SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT lower_product_id,
upper_product_id,
COUNT(1) AS frequency,
LISTAGG( order_id, ', ' ) WITHIN GROUP ( ORDER BY order_id ) AS order_ids
FROM (
SELECT order_id,
lower_product_id,
upper_product_id
FROM (
SELECT order_id,
PRIOR product_id AS lower_product_id,
product_id AS upper_product_id,
LEVEL AS lvl
FROM A
CONNECT BY
PRIOR order_id = order_id
AND PRIOR product_id < product_id
)
WHERE lvl = 2
)
GROUP BY lower_product_id, upper_product_id
ORDER BY frequency DESC, lower_product_id, upper_product_id
)
WHERE ROWNUM <= 3


Results:



| LOWER_PRODUCT_ID | UPPER_PRODUCT_ID | FREQUENCY | ORDER_IDS |
|------------------|------------------|-----------|-----------|
| 5 | 7 | 3 | 5, 6, 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 1, 4 |
| 3 | 10 | 2 | 3, 8 |


Query 2:



SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT A.product_id AS lower_product_id,
B.product_id AS upper_product_id,
COUNT(1) AS frequency,
LISTAGG( A.order_id, ', ' ) WITHIN GROUP ( ORDER BY A.order_id ) AS order_ids
FROM A
INNER JOIN A B
ON ( A.order_id = B.order_id
AND A.product_id < B.product_id )
GROUP BY A.product_id, B.product_id
ORDER BY frequency DESC, lower_product_id, upper_product_id
)
WHERE ROWNUM <= 3


Results:



| LOWER_PRODUCT_ID | UPPER_PRODUCT_ID | FREQUENCY | ORDER_IDS |
|------------------|------------------|-----------|-----------|
| 5 | 7 | 3 | 5, 6, 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 1, 4 |
| 3 | 10 | 2 | 3, 8 |





share|improve this answer

























  • Damn.... You are good

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 10:14















0














Two different queries (one hierarchical and the other with a self join) - both give the same answer (go for whichever is more performant):



SQL Fiddle



Oracle 11g R2 Schema Setup:



CREATE TABLE A (item_id, order_id, product_id) AS
SELECT 1, 1, 2 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 2, 2, 4 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 3, 3, 3 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 4, 3, 6 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 5, 4, 2 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 6, 5, 5 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 7, 6, 5 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 8, 7, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 9, 7, 7 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 10, 7, 9 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 11, 8, 10 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 12, 9, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 13, 5, 7 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 14, 7, 5 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 15, 6, 7 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 16, 1, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 17, 4, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 18, 8, 3 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 19, 3, 10 FROM DUAL


Query 1:



SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT lower_product_id,
upper_product_id,
COUNT(1) AS frequency,
LISTAGG( order_id, ', ' ) WITHIN GROUP ( ORDER BY order_id ) AS order_ids
FROM (
SELECT order_id,
lower_product_id,
upper_product_id
FROM (
SELECT order_id,
PRIOR product_id AS lower_product_id,
product_id AS upper_product_id,
LEVEL AS lvl
FROM A
CONNECT BY
PRIOR order_id = order_id
AND PRIOR product_id < product_id
)
WHERE lvl = 2
)
GROUP BY lower_product_id, upper_product_id
ORDER BY frequency DESC, lower_product_id, upper_product_id
)
WHERE ROWNUM <= 3


Results:



| LOWER_PRODUCT_ID | UPPER_PRODUCT_ID | FREQUENCY | ORDER_IDS |
|------------------|------------------|-----------|-----------|
| 5 | 7 | 3 | 5, 6, 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 1, 4 |
| 3 | 10 | 2 | 3, 8 |


Query 2:



SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT A.product_id AS lower_product_id,
B.product_id AS upper_product_id,
COUNT(1) AS frequency,
LISTAGG( A.order_id, ', ' ) WITHIN GROUP ( ORDER BY A.order_id ) AS order_ids
FROM A
INNER JOIN A B
ON ( A.order_id = B.order_id
AND A.product_id < B.product_id )
GROUP BY A.product_id, B.product_id
ORDER BY frequency DESC, lower_product_id, upper_product_id
)
WHERE ROWNUM <= 3


Results:



| LOWER_PRODUCT_ID | UPPER_PRODUCT_ID | FREQUENCY | ORDER_IDS |
|------------------|------------------|-----------|-----------|
| 5 | 7 | 3 | 5, 6, 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 1, 4 |
| 3 | 10 | 2 | 3, 8 |





share|improve this answer

























  • Damn.... You are good

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 10:14













0












0








0







Two different queries (one hierarchical and the other with a self join) - both give the same answer (go for whichever is more performant):



SQL Fiddle



Oracle 11g R2 Schema Setup:



CREATE TABLE A (item_id, order_id, product_id) AS
SELECT 1, 1, 2 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 2, 2, 4 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 3, 3, 3 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 4, 3, 6 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 5, 4, 2 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 6, 5, 5 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 7, 6, 5 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 8, 7, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 9, 7, 7 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 10, 7, 9 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 11, 8, 10 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 12, 9, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 13, 5, 7 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 14, 7, 5 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 15, 6, 7 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 16, 1, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 17, 4, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 18, 8, 3 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 19, 3, 10 FROM DUAL


Query 1:



SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT lower_product_id,
upper_product_id,
COUNT(1) AS frequency,
LISTAGG( order_id, ', ' ) WITHIN GROUP ( ORDER BY order_id ) AS order_ids
FROM (
SELECT order_id,
lower_product_id,
upper_product_id
FROM (
SELECT order_id,
PRIOR product_id AS lower_product_id,
product_id AS upper_product_id,
LEVEL AS lvl
FROM A
CONNECT BY
PRIOR order_id = order_id
AND PRIOR product_id < product_id
)
WHERE lvl = 2
)
GROUP BY lower_product_id, upper_product_id
ORDER BY frequency DESC, lower_product_id, upper_product_id
)
WHERE ROWNUM <= 3


Results:



| LOWER_PRODUCT_ID | UPPER_PRODUCT_ID | FREQUENCY | ORDER_IDS |
|------------------|------------------|-----------|-----------|
| 5 | 7 | 3 | 5, 6, 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 1, 4 |
| 3 | 10 | 2 | 3, 8 |


Query 2:



SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT A.product_id AS lower_product_id,
B.product_id AS upper_product_id,
COUNT(1) AS frequency,
LISTAGG( A.order_id, ', ' ) WITHIN GROUP ( ORDER BY A.order_id ) AS order_ids
FROM A
INNER JOIN A B
ON ( A.order_id = B.order_id
AND A.product_id < B.product_id )
GROUP BY A.product_id, B.product_id
ORDER BY frequency DESC, lower_product_id, upper_product_id
)
WHERE ROWNUM <= 3


Results:



| LOWER_PRODUCT_ID | UPPER_PRODUCT_ID | FREQUENCY | ORDER_IDS |
|------------------|------------------|-----------|-----------|
| 5 | 7 | 3 | 5, 6, 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 1, 4 |
| 3 | 10 | 2 | 3, 8 |





share|improve this answer















Two different queries (one hierarchical and the other with a self join) - both give the same answer (go for whichever is more performant):



SQL Fiddle



Oracle 11g R2 Schema Setup:



CREATE TABLE A (item_id, order_id, product_id) AS
SELECT 1, 1, 2 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 2, 2, 4 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 3, 3, 3 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 4, 3, 6 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 5, 4, 2 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 6, 5, 5 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 7, 6, 5 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 8, 7, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 9, 7, 7 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 10, 7, 9 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 11, 8, 10 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 12, 9, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 13, 5, 7 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 14, 7, 5 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 15, 6, 7 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 16, 1, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 17, 4, 1 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 18, 8, 3 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL SELECT 19, 3, 10 FROM DUAL


Query 1:



SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT lower_product_id,
upper_product_id,
COUNT(1) AS frequency,
LISTAGG( order_id, ', ' ) WITHIN GROUP ( ORDER BY order_id ) AS order_ids
FROM (
SELECT order_id,
lower_product_id,
upper_product_id
FROM (
SELECT order_id,
PRIOR product_id AS lower_product_id,
product_id AS upper_product_id,
LEVEL AS lvl
FROM A
CONNECT BY
PRIOR order_id = order_id
AND PRIOR product_id < product_id
)
WHERE lvl = 2
)
GROUP BY lower_product_id, upper_product_id
ORDER BY frequency DESC, lower_product_id, upper_product_id
)
WHERE ROWNUM <= 3


Results:



| LOWER_PRODUCT_ID | UPPER_PRODUCT_ID | FREQUENCY | ORDER_IDS |
|------------------|------------------|-----------|-----------|
| 5 | 7 | 3 | 5, 6, 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 1, 4 |
| 3 | 10 | 2 | 3, 8 |


Query 2:



SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT A.product_id AS lower_product_id,
B.product_id AS upper_product_id,
COUNT(1) AS frequency,
LISTAGG( A.order_id, ', ' ) WITHIN GROUP ( ORDER BY A.order_id ) AS order_ids
FROM A
INNER JOIN A B
ON ( A.order_id = B.order_id
AND A.product_id < B.product_id )
GROUP BY A.product_id, B.product_id
ORDER BY frequency DESC, lower_product_id, upper_product_id
)
WHERE ROWNUM <= 3


Results:



| LOWER_PRODUCT_ID | UPPER_PRODUCT_ID | FREQUENCY | ORDER_IDS |
|------------------|------------------|-----------|-----------|
| 5 | 7 | 3 | 5, 6, 7 |
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 1, 4 |
| 3 | 10 | 2 | 3, 8 |






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Sep 29 '15 at 10:29

























answered Sep 29 '15 at 10:07









MT0MT0

53.5k52756




53.5k52756












  • Damn.... You are good

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 10:14

















  • Damn.... You are good

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 10:14
















Damn.... You are good

– user2942951
Sep 29 '15 at 10:14





Damn.... You are good

– user2942951
Sep 29 '15 at 10:14













0














This could be what you want :



select item_id,order_id,product_id,
(case when order_id = product_id then 'Yes' else 'No' end) as pairs
from tableA
having pairs = 'Yes'
order by order_id asc
limit 3


or without using HAVING clause



select item_id,order_id,product_id
from tableA
where order_id = product_id
order by order_id asc
limit 3





share|improve this answer

























  • Think of it as consolidating the table into order_id's being unique... So when order_id = 1 all the product_id values are 1 and 2 so that is one occurrence of 1 and 2. When you consolidate order_id = 5 the product_id's would be 5 and 7 so that is one occurrence of 5 and 7. That make more sense?

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:58











  • @user2942951 Yes, I was missunderstood your question. Why don't put desired output in question instead of put them in comment?

    – RubahMalam
    Sep 29 '15 at 8:04















0














This could be what you want :



select item_id,order_id,product_id,
(case when order_id = product_id then 'Yes' else 'No' end) as pairs
from tableA
having pairs = 'Yes'
order by order_id asc
limit 3


or without using HAVING clause



select item_id,order_id,product_id
from tableA
where order_id = product_id
order by order_id asc
limit 3





share|improve this answer

























  • Think of it as consolidating the table into order_id's being unique... So when order_id = 1 all the product_id values are 1 and 2 so that is one occurrence of 1 and 2. When you consolidate order_id = 5 the product_id's would be 5 and 7 so that is one occurrence of 5 and 7. That make more sense?

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:58











  • @user2942951 Yes, I was missunderstood your question. Why don't put desired output in question instead of put them in comment?

    – RubahMalam
    Sep 29 '15 at 8:04













0












0








0







This could be what you want :



select item_id,order_id,product_id,
(case when order_id = product_id then 'Yes' else 'No' end) as pairs
from tableA
having pairs = 'Yes'
order by order_id asc
limit 3


or without using HAVING clause



select item_id,order_id,product_id
from tableA
where order_id = product_id
order by order_id asc
limit 3





share|improve this answer















This could be what you want :



select item_id,order_id,product_id,
(case when order_id = product_id then 'Yes' else 'No' end) as pairs
from tableA
having pairs = 'Yes'
order by order_id asc
limit 3


or without using HAVING clause



select item_id,order_id,product_id
from tableA
where order_id = product_id
order by order_id asc
limit 3






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Sep 29 '15 at 7:44

























answered Sep 29 '15 at 7:39









RubahMalamRubahMalam

1,7872919




1,7872919












  • Think of it as consolidating the table into order_id's being unique... So when order_id = 1 all the product_id values are 1 and 2 so that is one occurrence of 1 and 2. When you consolidate order_id = 5 the product_id's would be 5 and 7 so that is one occurrence of 5 and 7. That make more sense?

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:58











  • @user2942951 Yes, I was missunderstood your question. Why don't put desired output in question instead of put them in comment?

    – RubahMalam
    Sep 29 '15 at 8:04

















  • Think of it as consolidating the table into order_id's being unique... So when order_id = 1 all the product_id values are 1 and 2 so that is one occurrence of 1 and 2. When you consolidate order_id = 5 the product_id's would be 5 and 7 so that is one occurrence of 5 and 7. That make more sense?

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:58











  • @user2942951 Yes, I was missunderstood your question. Why don't put desired output in question instead of put them in comment?

    – RubahMalam
    Sep 29 '15 at 8:04
















Think of it as consolidating the table into order_id's being unique... So when order_id = 1 all the product_id values are 1 and 2 so that is one occurrence of 1 and 2. When you consolidate order_id = 5 the product_id's would be 5 and 7 so that is one occurrence of 5 and 7. That make more sense?

– user2942951
Sep 29 '15 at 7:58





Think of it as consolidating the table into order_id's being unique... So when order_id = 1 all the product_id values are 1 and 2 so that is one occurrence of 1 and 2. When you consolidate order_id = 5 the product_id's would be 5 and 7 so that is one occurrence of 5 and 7. That make more sense?

– user2942951
Sep 29 '15 at 7:58













@user2942951 Yes, I was missunderstood your question. Why don't put desired output in question instead of put them in comment?

– RubahMalam
Sep 29 '15 at 8:04





@user2942951 Yes, I was missunderstood your question. Why don't put desired output in question instead of put them in comment?

– RubahMalam
Sep 29 '15 at 8:04











0














If that's what you want to achieve,you can try this:



 select product_id,myranking from 
(select product_id, dense_rank() over(order by mycount desc) myranking from
(select product_id,count(*) over (partition by product_id) mycount from mytable))
where myranking<4 group by product_id,myranking


the output will be order_id with the most occurences at the product_id column and its rank






share|improve this answer

























  • This is close but not order_id and item_id pair. You want the top three occurring pairs of product_id's.

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:54











  • @user2942951 I updated my answer :)

    – Vance
    Sep 29 '15 at 9:20











  • Wow you are so close!!! But two things: 1. The query you wrote returns product_id = 2 as having counted 3 of them when only 2 is given. 2. You have to find a way to only count the product_id occurrence if it shows up with the other number (for example: you count product_id occurrence even if it isn't with its other pair. Think of the pair that share order_id as a single count of that pair not as individuals) Keep trying you are on the verge!! :D

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 9:54












  • and when product_id =1 you return 1 but it should return 2(product_id = 2 occurs 4 times but its highest pair is with 2 and theyoccur together 2times

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 10:00















0














If that's what you want to achieve,you can try this:



 select product_id,myranking from 
(select product_id, dense_rank() over(order by mycount desc) myranking from
(select product_id,count(*) over (partition by product_id) mycount from mytable))
where myranking<4 group by product_id,myranking


the output will be order_id with the most occurences at the product_id column and its rank






share|improve this answer

























  • This is close but not order_id and item_id pair. You want the top three occurring pairs of product_id's.

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:54











  • @user2942951 I updated my answer :)

    – Vance
    Sep 29 '15 at 9:20











  • Wow you are so close!!! But two things: 1. The query you wrote returns product_id = 2 as having counted 3 of them when only 2 is given. 2. You have to find a way to only count the product_id occurrence if it shows up with the other number (for example: you count product_id occurrence even if it isn't with its other pair. Think of the pair that share order_id as a single count of that pair not as individuals) Keep trying you are on the verge!! :D

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 9:54












  • and when product_id =1 you return 1 but it should return 2(product_id = 2 occurs 4 times but its highest pair is with 2 and theyoccur together 2times

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 10:00













0












0








0







If that's what you want to achieve,you can try this:



 select product_id,myranking from 
(select product_id, dense_rank() over(order by mycount desc) myranking from
(select product_id,count(*) over (partition by product_id) mycount from mytable))
where myranking<4 group by product_id,myranking


the output will be order_id with the most occurences at the product_id column and its rank






share|improve this answer















If that's what you want to achieve,you can try this:



 select product_id,myranking from 
(select product_id, dense_rank() over(order by mycount desc) myranking from
(select product_id,count(*) over (partition by product_id) mycount from mytable))
where myranking<4 group by product_id,myranking


the output will be order_id with the most occurences at the product_id column and its rank







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Sep 29 '15 at 9:18

























answered Sep 29 '15 at 7:37









VanceVance

83749




83749












  • This is close but not order_id and item_id pair. You want the top three occurring pairs of product_id's.

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:54











  • @user2942951 I updated my answer :)

    – Vance
    Sep 29 '15 at 9:20











  • Wow you are so close!!! But two things: 1. The query you wrote returns product_id = 2 as having counted 3 of them when only 2 is given. 2. You have to find a way to only count the product_id occurrence if it shows up with the other number (for example: you count product_id occurrence even if it isn't with its other pair. Think of the pair that share order_id as a single count of that pair not as individuals) Keep trying you are on the verge!! :D

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 9:54












  • and when product_id =1 you return 1 but it should return 2(product_id = 2 occurs 4 times but its highest pair is with 2 and theyoccur together 2times

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 10:00

















  • This is close but not order_id and item_id pair. You want the top three occurring pairs of product_id's.

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 7:54











  • @user2942951 I updated my answer :)

    – Vance
    Sep 29 '15 at 9:20











  • Wow you are so close!!! But two things: 1. The query you wrote returns product_id = 2 as having counted 3 of them when only 2 is given. 2. You have to find a way to only count the product_id occurrence if it shows up with the other number (for example: you count product_id occurrence even if it isn't with its other pair. Think of the pair that share order_id as a single count of that pair not as individuals) Keep trying you are on the verge!! :D

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 9:54












  • and when product_id =1 you return 1 but it should return 2(product_id = 2 occurs 4 times but its highest pair is with 2 and theyoccur together 2times

    – user2942951
    Sep 29 '15 at 10:00
















This is close but not order_id and item_id pair. You want the top three occurring pairs of product_id's.

– user2942951
Sep 29 '15 at 7:54





This is close but not order_id and item_id pair. You want the top three occurring pairs of product_id's.

– user2942951
Sep 29 '15 at 7:54













@user2942951 I updated my answer :)

– Vance
Sep 29 '15 at 9:20





@user2942951 I updated my answer :)

– Vance
Sep 29 '15 at 9:20













Wow you are so close!!! But two things: 1. The query you wrote returns product_id = 2 as having counted 3 of them when only 2 is given. 2. You have to find a way to only count the product_id occurrence if it shows up with the other number (for example: you count product_id occurrence even if it isn't with its other pair. Think of the pair that share order_id as a single count of that pair not as individuals) Keep trying you are on the verge!! :D

– user2942951
Sep 29 '15 at 9:54






Wow you are so close!!! But two things: 1. The query you wrote returns product_id = 2 as having counted 3 of them when only 2 is given. 2. You have to find a way to only count the product_id occurrence if it shows up with the other number (for example: you count product_id occurrence even if it isn't with its other pair. Think of the pair that share order_id as a single count of that pair not as individuals) Keep trying you are on the verge!! :D

– user2942951
Sep 29 '15 at 9:54














and when product_id =1 you return 1 but it should return 2(product_id = 2 occurs 4 times but its highest pair is with 2 and theyoccur together 2times

– user2942951
Sep 29 '15 at 10:00





and when product_id =1 you return 1 but it should return 2(product_id = 2 occurs 4 times but its highest pair is with 2 and theyoccur together 2times

– user2942951
Sep 29 '15 at 10:00

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f32837892%2fselect-top-three-pairs-of-numbers-that-appear-grouped-together-in-oracle-db%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Save data to MySQL database using ExtJS and PHP [closed]2019 Community Moderator ElectionHow can I prevent SQL injection in PHP?Which MySQL data type to use for storing boolean valuesPHP: Delete an element from an arrayHow do I connect to a MySQL Database in Python?Should I use the datetime or timestamp data type in MySQL?How to get a list of MySQL user accountsHow Do You Parse and Process HTML/XML in PHP?Reference — What does this symbol mean in PHP?How does PHP 'foreach' actually work?Why shouldn't I use mysql_* functions in PHP?

Compiling GNU Global with universal-ctags support Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Tags for Emacs: Relationship between etags, ebrowse, cscope, GNU Global and exuberant ctagsVim and Ctags tips and trickscscope or ctags why choose one over the other?scons and ctagsctags cannot open option file “.ctags”Adding tag scopes in universal-ctagsShould I use Universal-ctags?Universal ctags on WindowsHow do I install GNU Global with universal ctags support using Homebrew?Universal ctags with emacsHow to highlight ctags generated by Universal Ctags in Vim?

Add ONERROR event to image from jsp tldHow to add an image to a JPanel?Saving image from PHP URLHTML img scalingCheck if an image is loaded (no errors) with jQueryHow to force an <img> to take up width, even if the image is not loadedHow do I populate hidden form field with a value set in Spring ControllerStyling Raw elements Generated from JSP tagds with Jquery MobileLimit resizing of images with explicitly set width and height attributeserror TLD use in a jsp fileJsp tld files cannot be resolved