Azure Service Bus - MessageLockLostException when app is in Docker container, works fine otherwiseHow to list containers in DockerHow to remove old Docker containersCopying files from Docker container to hostCopying files from host to Docker containerWhat is the difference between a Docker image and a container?From inside of a Docker container, how do I connect to the localhost of the machine?Azure App hosted docker port 25MassTransit stop consuming messages from queue after reach MaxConcurrentCalls on Azure Service BusOpen ports on Azure Service BusDocker Container fails to start in an Azure App Service
Why didn't Theresa May consult with Parliament before negotiating a deal with the EU?
How does Loki do this?
Customer Requests (Sometimes) Drive Me Bonkers!
You cannot touch me, but I can touch you, who am I?
Anatomically Correct Strange Women In Ponds Distributing Swords
Where does the Z80 processor start executing from?
Is oxalic acid dihydrate considered a primary acid standard in analytical chemistry?
What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?
Integer addition + constant, is it a group?
Would this custom Sorcerer variant that can only learn any verbal-component-only spell be unbalanced?
Is there a korbon needed for conversion?
Proof of work - lottery approach
Tiptoe or tiphoof? Adjusting words to better fit fantasy races
Purchasing a ticket for someone else in another country?
Short story about space worker geeks who zone out by 'listening' to radiation from stars
Is this apparent Class Action settlement a spam message?
Is `x >> pure y` equivalent to `liftM (const y) x`
Is expanding the research of a group into machine learning as a PhD student risky?
Escape a backup date in a file name
Crossing the line between justified force and brutality
How to pronounce the slash sign
Go Pregnant or Go Home
How do I go from 300 unfinished/half written blog posts, to published posts?
What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?
Azure Service Bus - MessageLockLostException when app is in Docker container, works fine otherwise
How to list containers in DockerHow to remove old Docker containersCopying files from Docker container to hostCopying files from host to Docker containerWhat is the difference between a Docker image and a container?From inside of a Docker container, how do I connect to the localhost of the machine?Azure App hosted docker port 25MassTransit stop consuming messages from queue after reach MaxConcurrentCalls on Azure Service BusOpen ports on Azure Service BusDocker Container fails to start in an Azure App Service
We have a .NET Core console app that serves the role of a Saga/Process manager.
This Saga app communicates with other microservices via Azure Service Bus (with the use of MassTransit for messaging abstraction - MassTransit.Azure.ServiceBus)
The app contains a state machine (MassTransit/Automatonymous) that handles events - triggered by Service Bus messages.
In the current scenario the initial Saga event is triggered from an Azure Function App by publishing a message via MassTransit:
busControl.Publish(createSearchPageLinkEvent);
NOW, when:
a) the Saga app is ran as-is, (no containerization) - everything works fine, the event is handled correctly.
b) the Saga app is put into a Docker container, locally (using docker-compose in VS2017) - an Exception occurs. In essence - it seems that upon Publishing the message indeed reaches the Saga app, however the following Exception occurs instantly (excerpt):
Exception received on receiver:
sb://***.servicebus.windows.net/link_provider_saga during RenewLock,
Microsoft.Azure.ServiceBus.MessageLockLostException: The lock supplied
is invalid. Either the lock expired, or the message has already been
removed from the queue
Here is the message handling code in the state machine (Automatonymous) that never gets reached when dockerized:
Initially(
When(CreateSearchPageLinkEvent)
.Then(context =>
//Exception occurs before we get here
_log.Information($"context.Instance.CorrelationId CreateSearchPageLinkEvent for ");
context.Instance.PropertyType = context.Data.PropertyType;
context.Instance.SideName = context.Data.SideName;
context.Instance.TransactionType = context.Data.TransactionType;
context.Instance.Url = context.Data.Url;
)
Here is the docker-compose config:
version: '3.4'
services:
saga.azure:
image: $DOCKER_REGISTRY-sagaazure
build:
context: .
dockerfile: AcquireLinkTaskTracking.AzureDockerfile
ports:
- "443:443"
- "5671:5671"
- "5672:5672"
- "9350-9354:9350-9354"
Here is the app's DockerFile:
FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-runtime-nanoserver-1803 AS base
WORKDIR /app
FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-sdk-nanoserver-1803 AS build
WORKDIR /src
RUN dotnet restore AcquireLinkTaskTracking.Azure/Saga.Azure.csproj
//(...) Lots of dependendcy copying here
COPY . .
WORKDIR /src/AcquireLinkTaskTracking.Azure
RUN dotnet build Saga.Azure.csproj -c Debug -o /app
FROM build AS publish
RUN dotnet publish Saga.Azure.csproj -c Debug -o /app
FROM base AS final
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=publish /app .
ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "Saga.Azure.dll"]
Why would Docker cause communication issue?
My hunches are:
a) incorrect port mapping/publishing - however the triggering microservice obviously reaches the container somehow
b) The TLS protocol/certificate (used by Azure Service Bus) are not set up correctly (not a trivial thing to do)
PS the dockerized Saga app is launched from VS2017 locally by "Start Debugging" wth docker-compose
PS2 using EXPOSE for port 80 in the Dockerfile did not solve the issue
docker azureservicebus servicebus masstransit automatonymous
add a comment |
We have a .NET Core console app that serves the role of a Saga/Process manager.
This Saga app communicates with other microservices via Azure Service Bus (with the use of MassTransit for messaging abstraction - MassTransit.Azure.ServiceBus)
The app contains a state machine (MassTransit/Automatonymous) that handles events - triggered by Service Bus messages.
In the current scenario the initial Saga event is triggered from an Azure Function App by publishing a message via MassTransit:
busControl.Publish(createSearchPageLinkEvent);
NOW, when:
a) the Saga app is ran as-is, (no containerization) - everything works fine, the event is handled correctly.
b) the Saga app is put into a Docker container, locally (using docker-compose in VS2017) - an Exception occurs. In essence - it seems that upon Publishing the message indeed reaches the Saga app, however the following Exception occurs instantly (excerpt):
Exception received on receiver:
sb://***.servicebus.windows.net/link_provider_saga during RenewLock,
Microsoft.Azure.ServiceBus.MessageLockLostException: The lock supplied
is invalid. Either the lock expired, or the message has already been
removed from the queue
Here is the message handling code in the state machine (Automatonymous) that never gets reached when dockerized:
Initially(
When(CreateSearchPageLinkEvent)
.Then(context =>
//Exception occurs before we get here
_log.Information($"context.Instance.CorrelationId CreateSearchPageLinkEvent for ");
context.Instance.PropertyType = context.Data.PropertyType;
context.Instance.SideName = context.Data.SideName;
context.Instance.TransactionType = context.Data.TransactionType;
context.Instance.Url = context.Data.Url;
)
Here is the docker-compose config:
version: '3.4'
services:
saga.azure:
image: $DOCKER_REGISTRY-sagaazure
build:
context: .
dockerfile: AcquireLinkTaskTracking.AzureDockerfile
ports:
- "443:443"
- "5671:5671"
- "5672:5672"
- "9350-9354:9350-9354"
Here is the app's DockerFile:
FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-runtime-nanoserver-1803 AS base
WORKDIR /app
FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-sdk-nanoserver-1803 AS build
WORKDIR /src
RUN dotnet restore AcquireLinkTaskTracking.Azure/Saga.Azure.csproj
//(...) Lots of dependendcy copying here
COPY . .
WORKDIR /src/AcquireLinkTaskTracking.Azure
RUN dotnet build Saga.Azure.csproj -c Debug -o /app
FROM build AS publish
RUN dotnet publish Saga.Azure.csproj -c Debug -o /app
FROM base AS final
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=publish /app .
ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "Saga.Azure.dll"]
Why would Docker cause communication issue?
My hunches are:
a) incorrect port mapping/publishing - however the triggering microservice obviously reaches the container somehow
b) The TLS protocol/certificate (used by Azure Service Bus) are not set up correctly (not a trivial thing to do)
PS the dockerized Saga app is launched from VS2017 locally by "Start Debugging" wth docker-compose
PS2 using EXPOSE for port 80 in the Dockerfile did not solve the issue
docker azureservicebus servicebus masstransit automatonymous
add a comment |
We have a .NET Core console app that serves the role of a Saga/Process manager.
This Saga app communicates with other microservices via Azure Service Bus (with the use of MassTransit for messaging abstraction - MassTransit.Azure.ServiceBus)
The app contains a state machine (MassTransit/Automatonymous) that handles events - triggered by Service Bus messages.
In the current scenario the initial Saga event is triggered from an Azure Function App by publishing a message via MassTransit:
busControl.Publish(createSearchPageLinkEvent);
NOW, when:
a) the Saga app is ran as-is, (no containerization) - everything works fine, the event is handled correctly.
b) the Saga app is put into a Docker container, locally (using docker-compose in VS2017) - an Exception occurs. In essence - it seems that upon Publishing the message indeed reaches the Saga app, however the following Exception occurs instantly (excerpt):
Exception received on receiver:
sb://***.servicebus.windows.net/link_provider_saga during RenewLock,
Microsoft.Azure.ServiceBus.MessageLockLostException: The lock supplied
is invalid. Either the lock expired, or the message has already been
removed from the queue
Here is the message handling code in the state machine (Automatonymous) that never gets reached when dockerized:
Initially(
When(CreateSearchPageLinkEvent)
.Then(context =>
//Exception occurs before we get here
_log.Information($"context.Instance.CorrelationId CreateSearchPageLinkEvent for ");
context.Instance.PropertyType = context.Data.PropertyType;
context.Instance.SideName = context.Data.SideName;
context.Instance.TransactionType = context.Data.TransactionType;
context.Instance.Url = context.Data.Url;
)
Here is the docker-compose config:
version: '3.4'
services:
saga.azure:
image: $DOCKER_REGISTRY-sagaazure
build:
context: .
dockerfile: AcquireLinkTaskTracking.AzureDockerfile
ports:
- "443:443"
- "5671:5671"
- "5672:5672"
- "9350-9354:9350-9354"
Here is the app's DockerFile:
FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-runtime-nanoserver-1803 AS base
WORKDIR /app
FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-sdk-nanoserver-1803 AS build
WORKDIR /src
RUN dotnet restore AcquireLinkTaskTracking.Azure/Saga.Azure.csproj
//(...) Lots of dependendcy copying here
COPY . .
WORKDIR /src/AcquireLinkTaskTracking.Azure
RUN dotnet build Saga.Azure.csproj -c Debug -o /app
FROM build AS publish
RUN dotnet publish Saga.Azure.csproj -c Debug -o /app
FROM base AS final
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=publish /app .
ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "Saga.Azure.dll"]
Why would Docker cause communication issue?
My hunches are:
a) incorrect port mapping/publishing - however the triggering microservice obviously reaches the container somehow
b) The TLS protocol/certificate (used by Azure Service Bus) are not set up correctly (not a trivial thing to do)
PS the dockerized Saga app is launched from VS2017 locally by "Start Debugging" wth docker-compose
PS2 using EXPOSE for port 80 in the Dockerfile did not solve the issue
docker azureservicebus servicebus masstransit automatonymous
We have a .NET Core console app that serves the role of a Saga/Process manager.
This Saga app communicates with other microservices via Azure Service Bus (with the use of MassTransit for messaging abstraction - MassTransit.Azure.ServiceBus)
The app contains a state machine (MassTransit/Automatonymous) that handles events - triggered by Service Bus messages.
In the current scenario the initial Saga event is triggered from an Azure Function App by publishing a message via MassTransit:
busControl.Publish(createSearchPageLinkEvent);
NOW, when:
a) the Saga app is ran as-is, (no containerization) - everything works fine, the event is handled correctly.
b) the Saga app is put into a Docker container, locally (using docker-compose in VS2017) - an Exception occurs. In essence - it seems that upon Publishing the message indeed reaches the Saga app, however the following Exception occurs instantly (excerpt):
Exception received on receiver:
sb://***.servicebus.windows.net/link_provider_saga during RenewLock,
Microsoft.Azure.ServiceBus.MessageLockLostException: The lock supplied
is invalid. Either the lock expired, or the message has already been
removed from the queue
Here is the message handling code in the state machine (Automatonymous) that never gets reached when dockerized:
Initially(
When(CreateSearchPageLinkEvent)
.Then(context =>
//Exception occurs before we get here
_log.Information($"context.Instance.CorrelationId CreateSearchPageLinkEvent for ");
context.Instance.PropertyType = context.Data.PropertyType;
context.Instance.SideName = context.Data.SideName;
context.Instance.TransactionType = context.Data.TransactionType;
context.Instance.Url = context.Data.Url;
)
Here is the docker-compose config:
version: '3.4'
services:
saga.azure:
image: $DOCKER_REGISTRY-sagaazure
build:
context: .
dockerfile: AcquireLinkTaskTracking.AzureDockerfile
ports:
- "443:443"
- "5671:5671"
- "5672:5672"
- "9350-9354:9350-9354"
Here is the app's DockerFile:
FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-runtime-nanoserver-1803 AS base
WORKDIR /app
FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-sdk-nanoserver-1803 AS build
WORKDIR /src
RUN dotnet restore AcquireLinkTaskTracking.Azure/Saga.Azure.csproj
//(...) Lots of dependendcy copying here
COPY . .
WORKDIR /src/AcquireLinkTaskTracking.Azure
RUN dotnet build Saga.Azure.csproj -c Debug -o /app
FROM build AS publish
RUN dotnet publish Saga.Azure.csproj -c Debug -o /app
FROM base AS final
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=publish /app .
ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "Saga.Azure.dll"]
Why would Docker cause communication issue?
My hunches are:
a) incorrect port mapping/publishing - however the triggering microservice obviously reaches the container somehow
b) The TLS protocol/certificate (used by Azure Service Bus) are not set up correctly (not a trivial thing to do)
PS the dockerized Saga app is launched from VS2017 locally by "Start Debugging" wth docker-compose
PS2 using EXPOSE for port 80 in the Dockerfile did not solve the issue
docker azureservicebus servicebus masstransit automatonymous
docker azureservicebus servicebus masstransit automatonymous
edited Mar 7 at 13:18
sztepen
asked Mar 7 at 12:55
sztepensztepen
6817
6817
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Why would Docker cause communication issue?
Networking issue I suspect. Intermittent errors will take place and as a user you have to retry. And it's not just Docker where you could run into this problem.
RenewLock
is a client-side initiated operation and is not guaranteed to be successful. As such, failure to renew the message lock should be handled by a retry mechanism. You'd need to confirm with MassTransit if that's implemented or not. If not, your code will continue processing message assuming lock was extended when it wasn't. And when completion of an incoming message will be attempted, you'll get the MessageLockLostException
exception.
add a comment |
Ok, so this was a simple issue:
We simply used the wrong base image. The asp net core runtime image was needed. The diff to our dockerfile goes like this:
-FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-runtime-nanoserver-1803 AS base
+FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-aspnetcore-runtime-nanoserver-sac2016 AS base
-FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-sdk-nanoserver-1803 AS build
+FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-sdk-nanoserver-sac2016 AS build
you live, you learn.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55044327%2fazure-service-bus-messagelocklostexception-when-app-is-in-docker-container-wo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Why would Docker cause communication issue?
Networking issue I suspect. Intermittent errors will take place and as a user you have to retry. And it's not just Docker where you could run into this problem.
RenewLock
is a client-side initiated operation and is not guaranteed to be successful. As such, failure to renew the message lock should be handled by a retry mechanism. You'd need to confirm with MassTransit if that's implemented or not. If not, your code will continue processing message assuming lock was extended when it wasn't. And when completion of an incoming message will be attempted, you'll get the MessageLockLostException
exception.
add a comment |
Why would Docker cause communication issue?
Networking issue I suspect. Intermittent errors will take place and as a user you have to retry. And it's not just Docker where you could run into this problem.
RenewLock
is a client-side initiated operation and is not guaranteed to be successful. As such, failure to renew the message lock should be handled by a retry mechanism. You'd need to confirm with MassTransit if that's implemented or not. If not, your code will continue processing message assuming lock was extended when it wasn't. And when completion of an incoming message will be attempted, you'll get the MessageLockLostException
exception.
add a comment |
Why would Docker cause communication issue?
Networking issue I suspect. Intermittent errors will take place and as a user you have to retry. And it's not just Docker where you could run into this problem.
RenewLock
is a client-side initiated operation and is not guaranteed to be successful. As such, failure to renew the message lock should be handled by a retry mechanism. You'd need to confirm with MassTransit if that's implemented or not. If not, your code will continue processing message assuming lock was extended when it wasn't. And when completion of an incoming message will be attempted, you'll get the MessageLockLostException
exception.
Why would Docker cause communication issue?
Networking issue I suspect. Intermittent errors will take place and as a user you have to retry. And it's not just Docker where you could run into this problem.
RenewLock
is a client-side initiated operation and is not guaranteed to be successful. As such, failure to renew the message lock should be handled by a retry mechanism. You'd need to confirm with MassTransit if that's implemented or not. If not, your code will continue processing message assuming lock was extended when it wasn't. And when completion of an incoming message will be attempted, you'll get the MessageLockLostException
exception.
answered Mar 7 at 18:09
Sean FeldmanSean Feldman
9,61323051
9,61323051
add a comment |
add a comment |
Ok, so this was a simple issue:
We simply used the wrong base image. The asp net core runtime image was needed. The diff to our dockerfile goes like this:
-FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-runtime-nanoserver-1803 AS base
+FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-aspnetcore-runtime-nanoserver-sac2016 AS base
-FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-sdk-nanoserver-1803 AS build
+FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-sdk-nanoserver-sac2016 AS build
you live, you learn.
add a comment |
Ok, so this was a simple issue:
We simply used the wrong base image. The asp net core runtime image was needed. The diff to our dockerfile goes like this:
-FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-runtime-nanoserver-1803 AS base
+FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-aspnetcore-runtime-nanoserver-sac2016 AS base
-FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-sdk-nanoserver-1803 AS build
+FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-sdk-nanoserver-sac2016 AS build
you live, you learn.
add a comment |
Ok, so this was a simple issue:
We simply used the wrong base image. The asp net core runtime image was needed. The diff to our dockerfile goes like this:
-FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-runtime-nanoserver-1803 AS base
+FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-aspnetcore-runtime-nanoserver-sac2016 AS base
-FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-sdk-nanoserver-1803 AS build
+FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-sdk-nanoserver-sac2016 AS build
you live, you learn.
Ok, so this was a simple issue:
We simply used the wrong base image. The asp net core runtime image was needed. The diff to our dockerfile goes like this:
-FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-runtime-nanoserver-1803 AS base
+FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-aspnetcore-runtime-nanoserver-sac2016 AS base
-FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-sdk-nanoserver-1803 AS build
+FROM microsoft/dotnet:2.1-sdk-nanoserver-sac2016 AS build
you live, you learn.
answered Mar 10 at 21:36
sztepensztepen
6817
6817
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55044327%2fazure-service-bus-messagelocklostexception-when-app-is-in-docker-container-wo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown