Isomorphisms between regular graphs of same degreeHow to show that all 2-terminal SP-graphs are O(log n)-outer-planarEnumerate all non-isomorphic graphs of a certain sizeTo detect isomorphic graphs Is it enough to check if they have the same number of same degree vertices?Enumerate all non-isomorphic graphs of size ncounterexample for this graph isomorphism algorithmFind all non-isomorphic graphs with a particular degree sequenceGenerating all directed acyclic graphs with constraintsGenerate all non-isomorphic bounded-degree rooted graphs of bounded radiusHow similar is the Goldwasser-Sipser Set Lower Bound Protocol to the Hashcash/Bitcoin Proof-of-Work?Proof that locality is sufficient in showing two graphs are isomorphic

How to write a chaotic neutral protagonist and prevent my readers from thinking they are evil?

I can't die. Who am I?

How to resolve: Reviewer #1 says remove section X vs. Reviewer #2 says expand section X

Having the player face themselves after the mid-game

What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?

What can I do if someone tampers with my SSH public key?

What ability score modifier does a javelin's damage use?

I reported the illegal activity of my boss to his boss. My boss found out. Now I am being punished. What should I do?

Recommendation letter by significant other if you worked with them professionally?

Do items de-spawn?

What will happen if my luggage gets delayed?

School performs periodic password audits. Is my password compromised?

Is it a Cyclops number? "Nobody" knows!

Why does Central Limit Theorem break down in my simulation?

Is this Paypal Github SDK reference really a dangerous site?

What problems would a superhuman have who's skin is constantly hot?

How to draw dashed arc of a circle behind pyramid?

Doesn't allowing a user mode program to access kernel space memory and execute the IN and OUT instructions defeat the purpose of having CPU modes?

Would an aboleth's Phantasmal Force lair action be affected by Counterspell, Dispel Magic, and/or Slow?

When Schnorr signatures are part of Bitcoin will it be possible validate each block with only one signature validation?

Why is there an extra space when I type "ls" in the Desktop directory?

Is divide-by-zero a security vulnerability?

Shifting between bemols (flats) and diesis (sharps)in the key signature

Help find my computational error for logarithms



Isomorphisms between regular graphs of same degree


How to show that all 2-terminal SP-graphs are O(log n)-outer-planarEnumerate all non-isomorphic graphs of a certain sizeTo detect isomorphic graphs Is it enough to check if they have the same number of same degree vertices?Enumerate all non-isomorphic graphs of size ncounterexample for this graph isomorphism algorithmFind all non-isomorphic graphs with a particular degree sequenceGenerating all directed acyclic graphs with constraintsGenerate all non-isomorphic bounded-degree rooted graphs of bounded radiusHow similar is the Goldwasser-Sipser Set Lower Bound Protocol to the Hashcash/Bitcoin Proof-of-Work?Proof that locality is sufficient in showing two graphs are isomorphic













2












$begingroup$


Are all $n$-vertex regular graphs of degree $d$ isomorphic?



Can someone provide an example of two non-isomorphic graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ which are both regular with degree $d$ and have the same number of vertices (i.e., $|G_1| = |G_2|$)?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Yes indeed, but clearly regular graphs of degree 2 are not isomorphic to regular graphs of degree 3. So I'm asking about regular graphs of the same degree, if they have the same number of vertices, are they necessarily isomorphic?
    $endgroup$
    – Jim Newton
    Mar 6 at 12:37















2












$begingroup$


Are all $n$-vertex regular graphs of degree $d$ isomorphic?



Can someone provide an example of two non-isomorphic graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ which are both regular with degree $d$ and have the same number of vertices (i.e., $|G_1| = |G_2|$)?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Yes indeed, but clearly regular graphs of degree 2 are not isomorphic to regular graphs of degree 3. So I'm asking about regular graphs of the same degree, if they have the same number of vertices, are they necessarily isomorphic?
    $endgroup$
    – Jim Newton
    Mar 6 at 12:37













2












2








2





$begingroup$


Are all $n$-vertex regular graphs of degree $d$ isomorphic?



Can someone provide an example of two non-isomorphic graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ which are both regular with degree $d$ and have the same number of vertices (i.e., $|G_1| = |G_2|$)?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Are all $n$-vertex regular graphs of degree $d$ isomorphic?



Can someone provide an example of two non-isomorphic graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ which are both regular with degree $d$ and have the same number of vertices (i.e., $|G_1| = |G_2|$)?







graph-theory graph-isomorphism






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 6 at 13:51









dkaeae

1,996721




1,996721










asked Mar 6 at 9:38









Jim NewtonJim Newton

1107




1107











  • $begingroup$
    Yes indeed, but clearly regular graphs of degree 2 are not isomorphic to regular graphs of degree 3. So I'm asking about regular graphs of the same degree, if they have the same number of vertices, are they necessarily isomorphic?
    $endgroup$
    – Jim Newton
    Mar 6 at 12:37
















  • $begingroup$
    Yes indeed, but clearly regular graphs of degree 2 are not isomorphic to regular graphs of degree 3. So I'm asking about regular graphs of the same degree, if they have the same number of vertices, are they necessarily isomorphic?
    $endgroup$
    – Jim Newton
    Mar 6 at 12:37















$begingroup$
Yes indeed, but clearly regular graphs of degree 2 are not isomorphic to regular graphs of degree 3. So I'm asking about regular graphs of the same degree, if they have the same number of vertices, are they necessarily isomorphic?
$endgroup$
– Jim Newton
Mar 6 at 12:37




$begingroup$
Yes indeed, but clearly regular graphs of degree 2 are not isomorphic to regular graphs of degree 3. So I'm asking about regular graphs of the same degree, if they have the same number of vertices, are they necessarily isomorphic?
$endgroup$
– Jim Newton
Mar 6 at 12:37










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Playing around with a pencil and paper for a few minutes, it should be easy to come up with non-isomorphic $d$-regular graphs with the same number of vertices, for small $d$. For example, take two cycles of length $2n$ and connect chords across them in different ways.



However, there is a polynomial-time isomorphism algorithm for any class of graphs of bounded degree, which includes the $d$-regular graphs for any fixed $d$. It's due to Luks (Isomorphism of graphs of bounded valence can be tested in polynomial time, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 25(1):42–65, 1982) and uses a bunch of group theory.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    4












    $begingroup$

    Of course not.



    Consider, for example, the cycle $C_6$ with six vertices and the graph obtained by the union of two copies of $C_3$. Then both are 2-regular, but they are obviously not isomorphic.



    This is also the case if we restrict the question to connected graphs. Consider, for instance, the following two 3-regular graphs:



                                                    



    You can see they are not isomorphic because the second one contains cycles with six vertices that have chords; this is impossible in the first graph since it has precisely four six-cycles and you can see none of them have chords. (Or even easier: The second one has a five cycle, whereas the first one has only cycles with three, four, six, or more vertices.)



    What you might be able to prove is that all 2-regular and connected graphs are isomorphic (see, e.g., this), but this is a big restriction compared to the original question.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "419"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105214%2fisomorphisms-between-regular-graphs-of-same-degree%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      Playing around with a pencil and paper for a few minutes, it should be easy to come up with non-isomorphic $d$-regular graphs with the same number of vertices, for small $d$. For example, take two cycles of length $2n$ and connect chords across them in different ways.



      However, there is a polynomial-time isomorphism algorithm for any class of graphs of bounded degree, which includes the $d$-regular graphs for any fixed $d$. It's due to Luks (Isomorphism of graphs of bounded valence can be tested in polynomial time, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 25(1):42–65, 1982) and uses a bunch of group theory.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        4












        $begingroup$

        Playing around with a pencil and paper for a few minutes, it should be easy to come up with non-isomorphic $d$-regular graphs with the same number of vertices, for small $d$. For example, take two cycles of length $2n$ and connect chords across them in different ways.



        However, there is a polynomial-time isomorphism algorithm for any class of graphs of bounded degree, which includes the $d$-regular graphs for any fixed $d$. It's due to Luks (Isomorphism of graphs of bounded valence can be tested in polynomial time, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 25(1):42–65, 1982) and uses a bunch of group theory.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          Playing around with a pencil and paper for a few minutes, it should be easy to come up with non-isomorphic $d$-regular graphs with the same number of vertices, for small $d$. For example, take two cycles of length $2n$ and connect chords across them in different ways.



          However, there is a polynomial-time isomorphism algorithm for any class of graphs of bounded degree, which includes the $d$-regular graphs for any fixed $d$. It's due to Luks (Isomorphism of graphs of bounded valence can be tested in polynomial time, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 25(1):42–65, 1982) and uses a bunch of group theory.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Playing around with a pencil and paper for a few minutes, it should be easy to come up with non-isomorphic $d$-regular graphs with the same number of vertices, for small $d$. For example, take two cycles of length $2n$ and connect chords across them in different ways.



          However, there is a polynomial-time isomorphism algorithm for any class of graphs of bounded degree, which includes the $d$-regular graphs for any fixed $d$. It's due to Luks (Isomorphism of graphs of bounded valence can be tested in polynomial time, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 25(1):42–65, 1982) and uses a bunch of group theory.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 6 at 13:56









          David RicherbyDavid Richerby

          68.2k15103194




          68.2k15103194





















              4












              $begingroup$

              Of course not.



              Consider, for example, the cycle $C_6$ with six vertices and the graph obtained by the union of two copies of $C_3$. Then both are 2-regular, but they are obviously not isomorphic.



              This is also the case if we restrict the question to connected graphs. Consider, for instance, the following two 3-regular graphs:



                                                              



              You can see they are not isomorphic because the second one contains cycles with six vertices that have chords; this is impossible in the first graph since it has precisely four six-cycles and you can see none of them have chords. (Or even easier: The second one has a five cycle, whereas the first one has only cycles with three, four, six, or more vertices.)



              What you might be able to prove is that all 2-regular and connected graphs are isomorphic (see, e.g., this), but this is a big restriction compared to the original question.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                4












                $begingroup$

                Of course not.



                Consider, for example, the cycle $C_6$ with six vertices and the graph obtained by the union of two copies of $C_3$. Then both are 2-regular, but they are obviously not isomorphic.



                This is also the case if we restrict the question to connected graphs. Consider, for instance, the following two 3-regular graphs:



                                                                



                You can see they are not isomorphic because the second one contains cycles with six vertices that have chords; this is impossible in the first graph since it has precisely four six-cycles and you can see none of them have chords. (Or even easier: The second one has a five cycle, whereas the first one has only cycles with three, four, six, or more vertices.)



                What you might be able to prove is that all 2-regular and connected graphs are isomorphic (see, e.g., this), but this is a big restriction compared to the original question.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  4












                  4








                  4





                  $begingroup$

                  Of course not.



                  Consider, for example, the cycle $C_6$ with six vertices and the graph obtained by the union of two copies of $C_3$. Then both are 2-regular, but they are obviously not isomorphic.



                  This is also the case if we restrict the question to connected graphs. Consider, for instance, the following two 3-regular graphs:



                                                                  



                  You can see they are not isomorphic because the second one contains cycles with six vertices that have chords; this is impossible in the first graph since it has precisely four six-cycles and you can see none of them have chords. (Or even easier: The second one has a five cycle, whereas the first one has only cycles with three, four, six, or more vertices.)



                  What you might be able to prove is that all 2-regular and connected graphs are isomorphic (see, e.g., this), but this is a big restriction compared to the original question.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Of course not.



                  Consider, for example, the cycle $C_6$ with six vertices and the graph obtained by the union of two copies of $C_3$. Then both are 2-regular, but they are obviously not isomorphic.



                  This is also the case if we restrict the question to connected graphs. Consider, for instance, the following two 3-regular graphs:



                                                                  



                  You can see they are not isomorphic because the second one contains cycles with six vertices that have chords; this is impossible in the first graph since it has precisely four six-cycles and you can see none of them have chords. (Or even easier: The second one has a five cycle, whereas the first one has only cycles with three, four, six, or more vertices.)



                  What you might be able to prove is that all 2-regular and connected graphs are isomorphic (see, e.g., this), but this is a big restriction compared to the original question.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Mar 6 at 13:17

























                  answered Mar 6 at 12:48









                  dkaeaedkaeae

                  1,996721




                  1,996721



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105214%2fisomorphisms-between-regular-graphs-of-same-degree%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      1928 у кіно

                      Захаров Федір Захарович

                      Ель Греко