Automating merge conflict resolution Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Git: Confusion about merge algorithm, conflict format, and interplay with mergetoolsI ran into a merge conflict. How can I abort the merge?How to resolve merge conflicts in GitHow to selectively merge or pick changes from another branch in Git?When do you use git rebase instead of git merge?Undo a Git merge that hasn't been pushed yetHow can I merge two commits into one if I already started rebase?How do you push a tag to a remote repository using Git?What is the best (and safest) way to merge a Git branch into master?How to undo a git merge with conflictsResolve Git merge conflicts in favor of their changes during a pull
How do I use the new nonlinear finite element in Mathematica 12 for this equation?
How could we fake a moon landing now?
AppleTVs create a chatty alternate WiFi network
Did Deadpool rescue all of the X-Force?
If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what does Linux subsystem option mean?
Denied boarding although I have proper visa and documentation. To whom should I make a complaint?
How to write the following sign?
Dating a Former Employee
Should I use a zero-interest credit card for a large one-time purchase?
Question about debouncing - delay of state change
A term for a woman complaining about things/begging in a cute/childish way
Maximum summed subsequences with non-adjacent items
What is the topology associated with the algebras for the ultrafilter monad?
How to compare two different files line by line in unix?
Why do we need to use the builder design pattern when we can do the same thing with setters?
Is it a good idea to use CNN to classify 1D signal?
What would you call this weird metallic apparatus that allows you to lift people?
How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?
What is this clumpy 20-30cm high yellow-flowered plant?
Crossing US/Canada Border for less than 24 hours
How to install press fit bottom bracket into new frame
How were pictures turned from film to a big picture in a picture frame before digital scanning?
Using audio cues to encourage good posture
How would a mousetrap for use in space work?
Automating merge conflict resolution
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Git: Confusion about merge algorithm, conflict format, and interplay with mergetoolsI ran into a merge conflict. How can I abort the merge?How to resolve merge conflicts in GitHow to selectively merge or pick changes from another branch in Git?When do you use git rebase instead of git merge?Undo a Git merge that hasn't been pushed yetHow can I merge two commits into one if I already started rebase?How do you push a tag to a remote repository using Git?What is the best (and safest) way to merge a Git branch into master?How to undo a git merge with conflictsResolve Git merge conflicts in favor of their changes during a pull
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I'm using git mergetool with beyondcompare4 for solving git merge conflicts.
In my project files I often have tags for date/time/version-list that always gives me an merge conflict.
I would like to automate the resolutions of those conflicts. For e.g. selecting the latest date, or highest version number (there's a clear logic that i could script).
How could I achieve it?
Here's what i tried so far:
I tried to look for the git hook, but found none that fits my purpose. There's nothing like pre-merge hook
I wrote powershell script that loops through the merge conflicts, solves them according to my logic, and stages the changes. It works well if it's the only conflict within the file. If there are more conflicts, I cannot stage the changes, since it will stage conflicts as well. On another hand, if I run
git mergetool
after executing my script, BC4 ignores the changes the script have done, and shows those lines as conflicts.Looked for possibilities to run custom script using BC4 but it seems it does not have such a feature.
Any help appreciated,
Gintautas
git git-merge merge-conflict-resolution git-merge-conflict beyondcompare4
add a comment |
I'm using git mergetool with beyondcompare4 for solving git merge conflicts.
In my project files I often have tags for date/time/version-list that always gives me an merge conflict.
I would like to automate the resolutions of those conflicts. For e.g. selecting the latest date, or highest version number (there's a clear logic that i could script).
How could I achieve it?
Here's what i tried so far:
I tried to look for the git hook, but found none that fits my purpose. There's nothing like pre-merge hook
I wrote powershell script that loops through the merge conflicts, solves them according to my logic, and stages the changes. It works well if it's the only conflict within the file. If there are more conflicts, I cannot stage the changes, since it will stage conflicts as well. On another hand, if I run
git mergetool
after executing my script, BC4 ignores the changes the script have done, and shows those lines as conflicts.Looked for possibilities to run custom script using BC4 but it seems it does not have such a feature.
Any help appreciated,
Gintautas
git git-merge merge-conflict-resolution git-merge-conflict beyondcompare4
Doing this atgit mergetool
time is later than you should; the place to do them is earlier, in a merge driver. See stackoverflow.com/q/44212642/1256452
– torek
Mar 9 at 0:56
If I understand it correctly, custom merge driver completely overrides standard default merge driver. Meaning, I have to deal with all merge conflicts, not only the ones I want to fix automatically. Right?
– Gintautas
Mar 9 at 16:47
Yes. Fortunately, Git providesgit merge-file
, which implements the same low-level merge as the built in merge driver. So you can read the three inputs, find which input(s) have resolveable dateinfo conflicts, put the desired dateinfo into updated input files, and then rungit merge-file
on those updated inputs. (Here the word "dateinfo" is meant to cover your "date/time/version-list" combination.)
– torek
Mar 9 at 17:51
This solution has some issues; in particular you don't get the-X
extended flags. The merge driver code in Git really could use more %-directives.
– torek
Mar 9 at 17:52
add a comment |
I'm using git mergetool with beyondcompare4 for solving git merge conflicts.
In my project files I often have tags for date/time/version-list that always gives me an merge conflict.
I would like to automate the resolutions of those conflicts. For e.g. selecting the latest date, or highest version number (there's a clear logic that i could script).
How could I achieve it?
Here's what i tried so far:
I tried to look for the git hook, but found none that fits my purpose. There's nothing like pre-merge hook
I wrote powershell script that loops through the merge conflicts, solves them according to my logic, and stages the changes. It works well if it's the only conflict within the file. If there are more conflicts, I cannot stage the changes, since it will stage conflicts as well. On another hand, if I run
git mergetool
after executing my script, BC4 ignores the changes the script have done, and shows those lines as conflicts.Looked for possibilities to run custom script using BC4 but it seems it does not have such a feature.
Any help appreciated,
Gintautas
git git-merge merge-conflict-resolution git-merge-conflict beyondcompare4
I'm using git mergetool with beyondcompare4 for solving git merge conflicts.
In my project files I often have tags for date/time/version-list that always gives me an merge conflict.
I would like to automate the resolutions of those conflicts. For e.g. selecting the latest date, or highest version number (there's a clear logic that i could script).
How could I achieve it?
Here's what i tried so far:
I tried to look for the git hook, but found none that fits my purpose. There's nothing like pre-merge hook
I wrote powershell script that loops through the merge conflicts, solves them according to my logic, and stages the changes. It works well if it's the only conflict within the file. If there are more conflicts, I cannot stage the changes, since it will stage conflicts as well. On another hand, if I run
git mergetool
after executing my script, BC4 ignores the changes the script have done, and shows those lines as conflicts.Looked for possibilities to run custom script using BC4 but it seems it does not have such a feature.
Any help appreciated,
Gintautas
git git-merge merge-conflict-resolution git-merge-conflict beyondcompare4
git git-merge merge-conflict-resolution git-merge-conflict beyondcompare4
asked Mar 8 at 20:14
GintautasGintautas
83
83
Doing this atgit mergetool
time is later than you should; the place to do them is earlier, in a merge driver. See stackoverflow.com/q/44212642/1256452
– torek
Mar 9 at 0:56
If I understand it correctly, custom merge driver completely overrides standard default merge driver. Meaning, I have to deal with all merge conflicts, not only the ones I want to fix automatically. Right?
– Gintautas
Mar 9 at 16:47
Yes. Fortunately, Git providesgit merge-file
, which implements the same low-level merge as the built in merge driver. So you can read the three inputs, find which input(s) have resolveable dateinfo conflicts, put the desired dateinfo into updated input files, and then rungit merge-file
on those updated inputs. (Here the word "dateinfo" is meant to cover your "date/time/version-list" combination.)
– torek
Mar 9 at 17:51
This solution has some issues; in particular you don't get the-X
extended flags. The merge driver code in Git really could use more %-directives.
– torek
Mar 9 at 17:52
add a comment |
Doing this atgit mergetool
time is later than you should; the place to do them is earlier, in a merge driver. See stackoverflow.com/q/44212642/1256452
– torek
Mar 9 at 0:56
If I understand it correctly, custom merge driver completely overrides standard default merge driver. Meaning, I have to deal with all merge conflicts, not only the ones I want to fix automatically. Right?
– Gintautas
Mar 9 at 16:47
Yes. Fortunately, Git providesgit merge-file
, which implements the same low-level merge as the built in merge driver. So you can read the three inputs, find which input(s) have resolveable dateinfo conflicts, put the desired dateinfo into updated input files, and then rungit merge-file
on those updated inputs. (Here the word "dateinfo" is meant to cover your "date/time/version-list" combination.)
– torek
Mar 9 at 17:51
This solution has some issues; in particular you don't get the-X
extended flags. The merge driver code in Git really could use more %-directives.
– torek
Mar 9 at 17:52
Doing this at
git mergetool
time is later than you should; the place to do them is earlier, in a merge driver. See stackoverflow.com/q/44212642/1256452– torek
Mar 9 at 0:56
Doing this at
git mergetool
time is later than you should; the place to do them is earlier, in a merge driver. See stackoverflow.com/q/44212642/1256452– torek
Mar 9 at 0:56
If I understand it correctly, custom merge driver completely overrides standard default merge driver. Meaning, I have to deal with all merge conflicts, not only the ones I want to fix automatically. Right?
– Gintautas
Mar 9 at 16:47
If I understand it correctly, custom merge driver completely overrides standard default merge driver. Meaning, I have to deal with all merge conflicts, not only the ones I want to fix automatically. Right?
– Gintautas
Mar 9 at 16:47
Yes. Fortunately, Git provides
git merge-file
, which implements the same low-level merge as the built in merge driver. So you can read the three inputs, find which input(s) have resolveable dateinfo conflicts, put the desired dateinfo into updated input files, and then run git merge-file
on those updated inputs. (Here the word "dateinfo" is meant to cover your "date/time/version-list" combination.)– torek
Mar 9 at 17:51
Yes. Fortunately, Git provides
git merge-file
, which implements the same low-level merge as the built in merge driver. So you can read the three inputs, find which input(s) have resolveable dateinfo conflicts, put the desired dateinfo into updated input files, and then run git merge-file
on those updated inputs. (Here the word "dateinfo" is meant to cover your "date/time/version-list" combination.)– torek
Mar 9 at 17:51
This solution has some issues; in particular you don't get the
-X
extended flags. The merge driver code in Git really could use more %-directives.– torek
Mar 9 at 17:52
This solution has some issues; in particular you don't get the
-X
extended flags. The merge driver code in Git really could use more %-directives.– torek
Mar 9 at 17:52
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55070400%2fautomating-merge-conflict-resolution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55070400%2fautomating-merge-conflict-resolution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Doing this at
git mergetool
time is later than you should; the place to do them is earlier, in a merge driver. See stackoverflow.com/q/44212642/1256452– torek
Mar 9 at 0:56
If I understand it correctly, custom merge driver completely overrides standard default merge driver. Meaning, I have to deal with all merge conflicts, not only the ones I want to fix automatically. Right?
– Gintautas
Mar 9 at 16:47
Yes. Fortunately, Git provides
git merge-file
, which implements the same low-level merge as the built in merge driver. So you can read the three inputs, find which input(s) have resolveable dateinfo conflicts, put the desired dateinfo into updated input files, and then rungit merge-file
on those updated inputs. (Here the word "dateinfo" is meant to cover your "date/time/version-list" combination.)– torek
Mar 9 at 17:51
This solution has some issues; in particular you don't get the
-X
extended flags. The merge driver code in Git really could use more %-directives.– torek
Mar 9 at 17:52