How to whitelist custom port entry so Chrome offers the options to enable Camera and Mic2019 Community Moderator ElectiongetUserMedia is not working in chrome version 48.0.2560.0 while working in 46.0getUserMedia is not working in chrome version 48.0.2560.0 while working in 46.0navigator.mediaDevices.getUserMedia is not working and neither does webkitGetUserMediaWebRTC PermissionDeniedError getUserMedia on RTCMultiConnectionIn android's Google Chrome, how to set unsafely-treat-insecure-origin-as-secureHow to test HTML5 Audio recording on chrome 48How to access the camera feature in chrome latest version using http(insecure access)?WebRTC, browser doesn't ask for permission to use camera and microphone - but locally it doesUsing getUserMedia() on insecure origins in ChromeWebRTC on Chrome 67 working in US and not UKHow to access Camera and Microphone in Chrome without HTTPS?
When to use a slotted vs. solid turner?
Do I need to be arrogant to get ahead?
What does 高層ビルに何車線もの道路。mean?
Brexit - No Deal Rejection
New passport but visa is in old (lost) passport
What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?
What's the meaning of a knight fighting a snail in medieval book illustrations?
I am confused as to how the inverse of a certain function is found.
Custom alignment for GeoMarkers
How difficult is it to simply disable/disengage the MCAS on Boeing 737 Max 8 & 9 Aircraft?
A single argument pattern definition applies to multiple-argument patterns?
A diagram about partial derivatives of f(x,y)
Why one should not leave fingerprints on bulbs and plugs?
World War I as a war of liberals against authoritarians?
Why does overlay work only on the first tcolorbox?
How to deal with taxi scam when on vacation?
Have the tides ever turned twice on any open problem?
What is the relationship between relativity and the Doppler effect?
What exactly is this small puffer fish doing and how did it manage to accomplish such a feat?
Aluminum electrolytic or ceramic capacitors for linear regulator input and output?
Did Ender ever learn that he killed Stilson and/or Bonzo?
Math equation in non italic font
How to explain that I do not want to visit a country due to personal safety concern?
About the actual radiative impact of greenhouse gas emission over time
How to whitelist custom port entry so Chrome offers the options to enable Camera and Mic
2019 Community Moderator ElectiongetUserMedia is not working in chrome version 48.0.2560.0 while working in 46.0getUserMedia is not working in chrome version 48.0.2560.0 while working in 46.0navigator.mediaDevices.getUserMedia is not working and neither does webkitGetUserMediaWebRTC PermissionDeniedError getUserMedia on RTCMultiConnectionIn android's Google Chrome, how to set unsafely-treat-insecure-origin-as-secureHow to test HTML5 Audio recording on chrome 48How to access the camera feature in chrome latest version using http(insecure access)?WebRTC, browser doesn't ask for permission to use camera and microphone - but locally it doesUsing getUserMedia() on insecure origins in ChromeWebRTC on Chrome 67 working in US and not UKHow to access Camera and Microphone in Chrome without HTTPS?
I added a custom port in etc/hosts file
127.0.0.1 testlocalhost.com
When launch server(http not https) from this port, I noticed Chrome banned Camera and Mic permissions, and threw
getUserMedia() no longer works on insecure origins
When launch from localhost directly, I can change these 2 permissions although still seeing Your connection to this site is not secure warning.
I was wondering if it's possible to whitelist the custom port.
thanks!!!
(When test in Firefox, it still gives me the options to change Camera and Mic permissions.)
javascript
google-chrome webrtc getusermedia asked Mar 6 at 21:01
user8355591user8355591
224
add a comment |
I added a custom port in etc/hosts file
127.0.0.1 testlocalhost.com
When launch server(http not https) from this port, I noticed Chrome banned Camera and Mic permissions, and threw
getUserMedia() no longer works on insecure origins
When launch from localhost directly, I can change these 2 permissions although still seeing Your connection to this site is not secure warning.
I was wondering if it's possible to whitelist the custom port.
thanks!!!
(When test in Firefox, it still gives me the options to change Camera and Mic permissions.)
javascript
google-chrome webrtc getusermedia asked Mar 6 at 21:01
user8355591user8355591
224
Uselocalhost.
– Josh Lee
Mar 6 at 21:12
Possible duplicate of getUserMedia is not working in chrome version 48.0.2560.0 while working in 46.0
– Josh Lee
Mar 6 at 21:13
@JoshLee thanks for replying, it's intended to not use localhost but a custom port
– user8355591
Mar 6 at 21:14
add a comment |
I added a custom port in etc/hosts file
127.0.0.1 testlocalhost.com
When launch server(http not https) from this port, I noticed Chrome banned Camera and Mic permissions, and threw
getUserMedia() no longer works on insecure origins
When launch from localhost directly, I can change these 2 permissions although still seeing Your connection to this site is not secure warning.
I was wondering if it's possible to whitelist the custom port.
thanks!!!
(When test in Firefox, it still gives me the options to change Camera and Mic permissions.)
javascript
google-chrome webrtc getusermedia asked Mar 6 at 21:01
user8355591user8355591
224
I added a custom port in etc/hosts file
127.0.0.1 testlocalhost.com
When launch server(http not https) from this port, I noticed Chrome banned Camera and Mic permissions, and threw
getUserMedia() no longer works on insecure origins
When launch from localhost directly, I can change these 2 permissions although still seeing Your connection to this site is not secure warning.
I was wondering if it's possible to whitelist the custom port.
thanks!!!
(When test in Firefox, it still gives me the options to change Camera and Mic permissions.)
javascript
google-chrome webrtc getusermedia javascript
google-chrome webrtc getusermedia asked Mar 6 at 21:01
user8355591user8355591
224
asked Mar 6 at 21:01
user8355591user8355591
224
asked Mar 6 at 21:01
user8355591user8355591
224
asked Mar 6 at 21:01
user8355591user8355591
224
asked Mar 6 at 21:01
user8355591user8355591
224
224
Uselocalhost.
– Josh Lee
Mar 6 at 21:12
Possible duplicate of getUserMedia is not working in chrome version 48.0.2560.0 while working in 46.0
– Josh Lee
Mar 6 at 21:13
@JoshLee thanks for replying, it's intended to not use localhost but a custom port
– user8355591
Mar 6 at 21:14
add a comment |
Uselocalhost.
– Josh Lee
Mar 6 at 21:12
Possible duplicate of getUserMedia is not working in chrome version 48.0.2560.0 while working in 46.0
– Josh Lee
Mar 6 at 21:13
@JoshLee thanks for replying, it's intended to not use localhost but a custom port
– user8355591
Mar 6 at 21:14
Use
localhost.– Josh Lee
Mar 6 at 21:12
Use
localhost.– Josh Lee
Mar 6 at 21:12
Possible duplicate of getUserMedia is not working in chrome version 48.0.2560.0 while working in 46.0
– Josh Lee
Mar 6 at 21:13
Possible duplicate of getUserMedia is not working in chrome version 48.0.2560.0 while working in 46.0
– Josh Lee
Mar 6 at 21:13
@JoshLee thanks for replying, it's intended to not use localhost but a custom port
– user8355591
Mar 6 at 21:14
@JoshLee thanks for replying, it's intended to not use localhost but a custom port
– user8355591
Mar 6 at 21:14
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Short answer is no - you cannot bypass the saved word localhost with an IP address which represents it. The reason is that Google Chrome uses the actual word localhost to detect develper debugging and allow using getUserMedia via HTTP. All other addresses, regardless if they represent localhost or not, are only allowed to use getUserMedia via HTTPS or WSS.
answered Mar 7 at 8:41
Koby DouekKoby Douek
11.8k143863
add a comment |
Right in the error message you must have had, there is a link to this page, where there is a paragraph about Testing Powerful Features which enumerates a few options, and among them,
- You can run chrome with the
--unsafely-treat-insecure-origin-as-secure="http://example.com"flag (replacing"example.com"with the origin you actually want to test), which will treat that origin as secure for this session. Note that on Android and ChromeOS this requires having a device with root access/dev mode. (This flag is broken in Chrome 63 but fixed in Chrome 64 and later. Prior to Chrome 62, you must also include the--user-data-dir=/test/only/profile/dirto create a fresh testing profile for the flag to work.)
So you just have to start Chrome from command lines with the flag --unsafely-treat-insecure-origin-as-secure="http://testlocalhost.com"
answered Mar 7 at 9:15
KaiidoKaiido
44.2k466106
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55032062%2fhow-to-whitelist-custom-port-entry-so-chrome-offers-the-options-to-enable-camera%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Short answer is no - you cannot bypass the saved word localhost with an IP address which represents it. The reason is that Google Chrome uses the actual word localhost to detect develper debugging and allow using getUserMedia via HTTP. All other addresses, regardless if they represent localhost or not, are only allowed to use getUserMedia via HTTPS or WSS.
answered Mar 7 at 8:41
Koby DouekKoby Douek
11.8k143863
add a comment |
Short answer is no - you cannot bypass the saved word localhost with an IP address which represents it. The reason is that Google Chrome uses the actual word localhost to detect develper debugging and allow using getUserMedia via HTTP. All other addresses, regardless if they represent localhost or not, are only allowed to use getUserMedia via HTTPS or WSS.
answered Mar 7 at 8:41
Koby DouekKoby Douek
11.8k143863
add a comment |
Short answer is no - you cannot bypass the saved word localhost with an IP address which represents it. The reason is that Google Chrome uses the actual word localhost to detect develper debugging and allow using getUserMedia via HTTP. All other addresses, regardless if they represent localhost or not, are only allowed to use getUserMedia via HTTPS or WSS.
answered Mar 7 at 8:41
Koby DouekKoby Douek
11.8k143863
Short answer is no - you cannot bypass the saved word localhost with an IP address which represents it. The reason is that Google Chrome uses the actual word localhost to detect develper debugging and allow using getUserMedia via HTTP. All other addresses, regardless if they represent localhost or not, are only allowed to use getUserMedia via HTTPS or WSS.
answered Mar 7 at 8:41
Koby DouekKoby Douek
11.8k143863
answered Mar 7 at 8:41
Koby DouekKoby Douek
11.8k143863
answered Mar 7 at 8:41
Koby DouekKoby Douek
11.8k143863
answered Mar 7 at 8:41
Koby DouekKoby Douek
11.8k143863
11.8k143863
add a comment |
add a comment |
Right in the error message you must have had, there is a link to this page, where there is a paragraph about Testing Powerful Features which enumerates a few options, and among them,
- You can run chrome with the
--unsafely-treat-insecure-origin-as-secure="http://example.com"flag (replacing"example.com"with the origin you actually want to test), which will treat that origin as secure for this session. Note that on Android and ChromeOS this requires having a device with root access/dev mode. (This flag is broken in Chrome 63 but fixed in Chrome 64 and later. Prior to Chrome 62, you must also include the--user-data-dir=/test/only/profile/dirto create a fresh testing profile for the flag to work.)
So you just have to start Chrome from command lines with the flag --unsafely-treat-insecure-origin-as-secure="http://testlocalhost.com"
answered Mar 7 at 9:15
KaiidoKaiido
44.2k466106
add a comment |
Right in the error message you must have had, there is a link to this page, where there is a paragraph about Testing Powerful Features which enumerates a few options, and among them,
- You can run chrome with the
--unsafely-treat-insecure-origin-as-secure="http://example.com"flag (replacing"example.com"with the origin you actually want to test), which will treat that origin as secure for this session. Note that on Android and ChromeOS this requires having a device with root access/dev mode. (This flag is broken in Chrome 63 but fixed in Chrome 64 and later. Prior to Chrome 62, you must also include the--user-data-dir=/test/only/profile/dirto create a fresh testing profile for the flag to work.)
So you just have to start Chrome from command lines with the flag --unsafely-treat-insecure-origin-as-secure="http://testlocalhost.com"
answered Mar 7 at 9:15
KaiidoKaiido
44.2k466106
add a comment |
Right in the error message you must have had, there is a link to this page, where there is a paragraph about Testing Powerful Features which enumerates a few options, and among them,
- You can run chrome with the
--unsafely-treat-insecure-origin-as-secure="http://example.com"flag (replacing"example.com"with the origin you actually want to test), which will treat that origin as secure for this session. Note that on Android and ChromeOS this requires having a device with root access/dev mode. (This flag is broken in Chrome 63 but fixed in Chrome 64 and later. Prior to Chrome 62, you must also include the--user-data-dir=/test/only/profile/dirto create a fresh testing profile for the flag to work.)
So you just have to start Chrome from command lines with the flag --unsafely-treat-insecure-origin-as-secure="http://testlocalhost.com"
answered Mar 7 at 9:15
KaiidoKaiido
44.2k466106
Right in the error message you must have had, there is a link to this page, where there is a paragraph about Testing Powerful Features which enumerates a few options, and among them,
- You can run chrome with the
--unsafely-treat-insecure-origin-as-secure="http://example.com"flag (replacing"example.com"with the origin you actually want to test), which will treat that origin as secure for this session. Note that on Android and ChromeOS this requires having a device with root access/dev mode. (This flag is broken in Chrome 63 but fixed in Chrome 64 and later. Prior to Chrome 62, you must also include the--user-data-dir=/test/only/profile/dirto create a fresh testing profile for the flag to work.)
So you just have to start Chrome from command lines with the flag --unsafely-treat-insecure-origin-as-secure="http://testlocalhost.com"
answered Mar 7 at 9:15
KaiidoKaiido
44.2k466106
answered Mar 7 at 9:15
KaiidoKaiido
44.2k466106
answered Mar 7 at 9:15
KaiidoKaiido
44.2k466106
answered Mar 7 at 9:15
KaiidoKaiido
44.2k466106
44.2k466106
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55032062%2fhow-to-whitelist-custom-port-entry-so-chrome-offers-the-options-to-enable-camera%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Use
localhost.– Josh Lee
Mar 6 at 21:12
Possible duplicate of getUserMedia is not working in chrome version 48.0.2560.0 while working in 46.0
– Josh Lee
Mar 6 at 21:13
@JoshLee thanks for replying, it's intended to not use localhost but a custom port
– user8355591
Mar 6 at 21:14