Can a Mimic (container form) actually hold loot? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow do current D&D 4e DMs deal with loot?Mimic's adhesiveHow can I balance loot distribution for my players?Can a Mimic mimic another creature?How can I determine how much of the loot the PCs find?Could a Mimic mimic a Simulacrum?Guidelines for speeding up looting process for player characters?How to handle loot disputes as the DM?Is it common practice in 3.5/Pathfinder to give players loot they can use as gear?At what level can a party fight a mimic?

Audio Conversion With ADS1243

What difference does it make using sed with/without whitespaces?

Redefining symbol midway through a document

Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?

Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?

What happened in Rome, when the western empire "fell"?

Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review?

Airplane gently rocking its wings during whole flight

Do scriptures give a method to recognize a truly self-realized person/jivanmukta?

Traveling with my 5 year old daughter (as the father) without the mother from Germany to Mexico

How to find image of a complex function with given constraints?

IC has pull-down resistors on SMBus lines?

How to Implement Deterministic Encryption Safely in .NET

Help/tips for a first time writer?

TikZ: How to fill area with a special pattern?

Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed, considered Gaussian?

What is the process for cleansing a very negative action

Help! I cannot understand this game’s notations!

Scary film where a woman has vaginal teeth

Purpose of level-shifter with same in and out voltages

Does Germany produce more waste than the US?

Can you teleport closer to a creature you are Frightened of?

Yu-Gi-Oh cards in Python 3

Man transported from Alternate World into ours by a Neutrino Detector



Can a Mimic (container form) actually hold loot?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow do current D&D 4e DMs deal with loot?Mimic's adhesiveHow can I balance loot distribution for my players?Can a Mimic mimic another creature?How can I determine how much of the loot the PCs find?Could a Mimic mimic a Simulacrum?Guidelines for speeding up looting process for player characters?How to handle loot disputes as the DM?Is it common practice in 3.5/Pathfinder to give players loot they can use as gear?At what level can a party fight a mimic?










14












$begingroup$


I want my players to be able to kill a Mimic and get the loot from the Mimic's corpse.



The Mimic has an acidic bite, and is a creature, not actually a container.



Can a Mimic store items?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    14












    $begingroup$


    I want my players to be able to kill a Mimic and get the loot from the Mimic's corpse.



    The Mimic has an acidic bite, and is a creature, not actually a container.



    Can a Mimic store items?










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      14












      14








      14


      1



      $begingroup$


      I want my players to be able to kill a Mimic and get the loot from the Mimic's corpse.



      The Mimic has an acidic bite, and is a creature, not actually a container.



      Can a Mimic store items?










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I want my players to be able to kill a Mimic and get the loot from the Mimic's corpse.



      The Mimic has an acidic bite, and is a creature, not actually a container.



      Can a Mimic store items?







      dnd-5e monsters treasure mimic






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 7 at 16:29









      goodguy5goodguy5

      9,62623577




      9,62623577




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Absolutely




          Shapechanger. The mimic can use its action to polymorph into an object or back into its true, amorphous form.




          A chest has an inside and an outside. So a mimic polymorphed into a chest has an inside and an outside.



          Mimics are also not-unintelligent and a mimic could see great utility in being an open chest and then using its Pseudopod to fill itself up to overflowing with nice, tempting treasure.



          Now, we know "It reverts to its true form if it dies" but “amorphous” means having no fixed defined form. Maybe each mimic has its own “true, amorphous form”. Or maybe they look like this:



          enter image description here



          If so, that juicy treasure that was inside the chest would probably be lolling about inside that remarkably large mouth.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 4




            $begingroup$
            RAW as you quote it's true form is "amorphous". This trait usually allows creatures to "move through a space as narrow as 1 inch wide". This implies some sort of ooze creature that could contain items in suspension.
            $endgroup$
            – OrangeDog
            Mar 8 at 10:44










          • $begingroup$
            @OrangeDog actually “amorphous” means having no fixed shape
            $endgroup$
            – Dale M
            Mar 8 at 21:35










          • $begingroup$
            I know what it means. I’m telling you what the 5e rulebooks say.
            $endgroup$
            – OrangeDog
            Mar 8 at 21:36






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Amorphous means lacking definite form. Oozes, amoebas, piles of jelly are amorphous. That last image is not an amorphous form.
            $endgroup$
            – SevenSidedDie
            Mar 8 at 22:52



















          13












          $begingroup$

          It's fairly common in published adventures for e.g. a roper to have loot in its gizzard. It occurs multiple times in Tales from the Yawning Portal.



          The monster's manual even suggests treasure winds up there. From page 261.




          A roper can digest anything it eats with the exception of platinum, gemstones, and magic items, which can sometimes be retrieved from the creature's gizzard after death.




          There's no reason your mimic couldn't have something similar, though I suppose it's not really explicitly spelled out as a common mimic characteristic.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Purely out of morbid curiosity - can you a cite a published adventure that has that? And do players have to specifically say they're searching inside it?
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            Mar 7 at 17:11






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            "common in published adventures", "the monster's manual even suggests" your answer would be much more convincing if you found examples and provided some or citations to back up these claims. It is important that answers are backed up properly as we require on this site.
            $endgroup$
            – Rubiksmoose
            Mar 7 at 17:12







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @NautArch It happens a few times in Tales from the Yawning Portal. Players do have to explicitly state that they're searching the gizzard.
            $endgroup$
            – kyle sexton
            Mar 7 at 17:44






          • 5




            $begingroup$
            @kylesexton Actually, we are allowed to do so. If you post sections of sources (not like the whole thing obviously) here that is well within the norm here and is perfectly fine. In fact, doing so is encouraged. Again not the whole thing, but just whatever part is needed to make your point.
            $endgroup$
            – Rubiksmoose
            Mar 7 at 17:45







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            The quote seems to indicate that only platinum, gemstones, and magic items can be retrieved from a roper's guts. That is, other "loot" including lesser metals like gold and silver, won't be present as they'd be digested. It seems to me that this indicates that should anything be found, it would be relatively rare or valuable compared to a chest or other loot source.
            $endgroup$
            – Roddy of the Frozen Peas
            Mar 8 at 2:22


















          7












          $begingroup$

          Probably not



          Because the mimic has the always on property of Adhesive when in object form:




          The mimic adheres to anything that touches it.




          It seems unlikely that someone was able to get something inside of it. Once it moves, it's no longer the object and is instead it's true form. And I'd saying that it opening is it moving (because it's moving.)



          However, should whomever is using it want to store something inside it (cruel!), I'm not sure that would be totally against the rules.



          Storing items inside creatures



          I guess technically it can 'contain' the item - but the players are going to have to 'dig' for it.



          The mimic is only an object when it's using it's shapechanger ability (my emphasis):




          The mimic can use its action to polymorph into an object or back into its true, amorphous form. Its statistics are the same in each form. Any equipment it is wearing or carrying isn't transformed. It reverts to its true form if it dies.




          If they've killed it, then it's no longer acting as the 'container', but I don't see why it can't still have something inside it (heck, any monster could have items implanted, I guess.)






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            4












            $begingroup$

            As a container, no.



            When the mimic dies, it reverts into it's true shape, which is not a container which would normally contain loot. It could have eaten something like an enchanted ring by mistake or something while feasting on the poor adventurer before you, but otherwise, I think it would be on the outside of the Mimic due to its Adhesive property. Now, other monsters do have the ability to have loot inside them, as @kyle sexton has said, like the Roper, which is actually stated in the MM:




            A roper can digest anything it eats with the exception of platinum, gemstones, and magic items, which can sometimes be retrieved from the creature’s gizzard after death. A roper’s digestive juices are also valuable, fetching a high price from alchemists who use them as a solvent.




            Then you have the Purple Worm which eats through the earth, and can have gems and the like inside its stomach, which is also referenced in the MM:




            When a purple worm burrows through the ground, it consumes earth and rock, which it breaks down and constantly excretes. Precious metals and gems can thus be found within the bodies of purple worms, which are targeted by particularly brave and foolhardy treasure hunters.




            So... For the mimic, I would think not, but as DM, you could rule it so. Other monsters consume things that they cannot digest and you can loot them for it, so why not the mimic?






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "122"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142663%2fcan-a-mimic-container-form-actually-hold-loot%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes








              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2












              $begingroup$

              Absolutely




              Shapechanger. The mimic can use its action to polymorph into an object or back into its true, amorphous form.




              A chest has an inside and an outside. So a mimic polymorphed into a chest has an inside and an outside.



              Mimics are also not-unintelligent and a mimic could see great utility in being an open chest and then using its Pseudopod to fill itself up to overflowing with nice, tempting treasure.



              Now, we know "It reverts to its true form if it dies" but “amorphous” means having no fixed defined form. Maybe each mimic has its own “true, amorphous form”. Or maybe they look like this:



              enter image description here



              If so, that juicy treasure that was inside the chest would probably be lolling about inside that remarkably large mouth.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$








              • 4




                $begingroup$
                RAW as you quote it's true form is "amorphous". This trait usually allows creatures to "move through a space as narrow as 1 inch wide". This implies some sort of ooze creature that could contain items in suspension.
                $endgroup$
                – OrangeDog
                Mar 8 at 10:44










              • $begingroup$
                @OrangeDog actually “amorphous” means having no fixed shape
                $endgroup$
                – Dale M
                Mar 8 at 21:35










              • $begingroup$
                I know what it means. I’m telling you what the 5e rulebooks say.
                $endgroup$
                – OrangeDog
                Mar 8 at 21:36






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                Amorphous means lacking definite form. Oozes, amoebas, piles of jelly are amorphous. That last image is not an amorphous form.
                $endgroup$
                – SevenSidedDie
                Mar 8 at 22:52
















              2












              $begingroup$

              Absolutely




              Shapechanger. The mimic can use its action to polymorph into an object or back into its true, amorphous form.




              A chest has an inside and an outside. So a mimic polymorphed into a chest has an inside and an outside.



              Mimics are also not-unintelligent and a mimic could see great utility in being an open chest and then using its Pseudopod to fill itself up to overflowing with nice, tempting treasure.



              Now, we know "It reverts to its true form if it dies" but “amorphous” means having no fixed defined form. Maybe each mimic has its own “true, amorphous form”. Or maybe they look like this:



              enter image description here



              If so, that juicy treasure that was inside the chest would probably be lolling about inside that remarkably large mouth.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$








              • 4




                $begingroup$
                RAW as you quote it's true form is "amorphous". This trait usually allows creatures to "move through a space as narrow as 1 inch wide". This implies some sort of ooze creature that could contain items in suspension.
                $endgroup$
                – OrangeDog
                Mar 8 at 10:44










              • $begingroup$
                @OrangeDog actually “amorphous” means having no fixed shape
                $endgroup$
                – Dale M
                Mar 8 at 21:35










              • $begingroup$
                I know what it means. I’m telling you what the 5e rulebooks say.
                $endgroup$
                – OrangeDog
                Mar 8 at 21:36






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                Amorphous means lacking definite form. Oozes, amoebas, piles of jelly are amorphous. That last image is not an amorphous form.
                $endgroup$
                – SevenSidedDie
                Mar 8 at 22:52














              2












              2








              2





              $begingroup$

              Absolutely




              Shapechanger. The mimic can use its action to polymorph into an object or back into its true, amorphous form.




              A chest has an inside and an outside. So a mimic polymorphed into a chest has an inside and an outside.



              Mimics are also not-unintelligent and a mimic could see great utility in being an open chest and then using its Pseudopod to fill itself up to overflowing with nice, tempting treasure.



              Now, we know "It reverts to its true form if it dies" but “amorphous” means having no fixed defined form. Maybe each mimic has its own “true, amorphous form”. Or maybe they look like this:



              enter image description here



              If so, that juicy treasure that was inside the chest would probably be lolling about inside that remarkably large mouth.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              Absolutely




              Shapechanger. The mimic can use its action to polymorph into an object or back into its true, amorphous form.




              A chest has an inside and an outside. So a mimic polymorphed into a chest has an inside and an outside.



              Mimics are also not-unintelligent and a mimic could see great utility in being an open chest and then using its Pseudopod to fill itself up to overflowing with nice, tempting treasure.



              Now, we know "It reverts to its true form if it dies" but “amorphous” means having no fixed defined form. Maybe each mimic has its own “true, amorphous form”. Or maybe they look like this:



              enter image description here



              If so, that juicy treasure that was inside the chest would probably be lolling about inside that remarkably large mouth.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Mar 8 at 21:37

























              answered Mar 8 at 1:57









              Dale MDale M

              110k24285488




              110k24285488







              • 4




                $begingroup$
                RAW as you quote it's true form is "amorphous". This trait usually allows creatures to "move through a space as narrow as 1 inch wide". This implies some sort of ooze creature that could contain items in suspension.
                $endgroup$
                – OrangeDog
                Mar 8 at 10:44










              • $begingroup$
                @OrangeDog actually “amorphous” means having no fixed shape
                $endgroup$
                – Dale M
                Mar 8 at 21:35










              • $begingroup$
                I know what it means. I’m telling you what the 5e rulebooks say.
                $endgroup$
                – OrangeDog
                Mar 8 at 21:36






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                Amorphous means lacking definite form. Oozes, amoebas, piles of jelly are amorphous. That last image is not an amorphous form.
                $endgroup$
                – SevenSidedDie
                Mar 8 at 22:52













              • 4




                $begingroup$
                RAW as you quote it's true form is "amorphous". This trait usually allows creatures to "move through a space as narrow as 1 inch wide". This implies some sort of ooze creature that could contain items in suspension.
                $endgroup$
                – OrangeDog
                Mar 8 at 10:44










              • $begingroup$
                @OrangeDog actually “amorphous” means having no fixed shape
                $endgroup$
                – Dale M
                Mar 8 at 21:35










              • $begingroup$
                I know what it means. I’m telling you what the 5e rulebooks say.
                $endgroup$
                – OrangeDog
                Mar 8 at 21:36






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                Amorphous means lacking definite form. Oozes, amoebas, piles of jelly are amorphous. That last image is not an amorphous form.
                $endgroup$
                – SevenSidedDie
                Mar 8 at 22:52








              4




              4




              $begingroup$
              RAW as you quote it's true form is "amorphous". This trait usually allows creatures to "move through a space as narrow as 1 inch wide". This implies some sort of ooze creature that could contain items in suspension.
              $endgroup$
              – OrangeDog
              Mar 8 at 10:44




              $begingroup$
              RAW as you quote it's true form is "amorphous". This trait usually allows creatures to "move through a space as narrow as 1 inch wide". This implies some sort of ooze creature that could contain items in suspension.
              $endgroup$
              – OrangeDog
              Mar 8 at 10:44












              $begingroup$
              @OrangeDog actually “amorphous” means having no fixed shape
              $endgroup$
              – Dale M
              Mar 8 at 21:35




              $begingroup$
              @OrangeDog actually “amorphous” means having no fixed shape
              $endgroup$
              – Dale M
              Mar 8 at 21:35












              $begingroup$
              I know what it means. I’m telling you what the 5e rulebooks say.
              $endgroup$
              – OrangeDog
              Mar 8 at 21:36




              $begingroup$
              I know what it means. I’m telling you what the 5e rulebooks say.
              $endgroup$
              – OrangeDog
              Mar 8 at 21:36




              2




              2




              $begingroup$
              Amorphous means lacking definite form. Oozes, amoebas, piles of jelly are amorphous. That last image is not an amorphous form.
              $endgroup$
              – SevenSidedDie
              Mar 8 at 22:52





              $begingroup$
              Amorphous means lacking definite form. Oozes, amoebas, piles of jelly are amorphous. That last image is not an amorphous form.
              $endgroup$
              – SevenSidedDie
              Mar 8 at 22:52














              13












              $begingroup$

              It's fairly common in published adventures for e.g. a roper to have loot in its gizzard. It occurs multiple times in Tales from the Yawning Portal.



              The monster's manual even suggests treasure winds up there. From page 261.




              A roper can digest anything it eats with the exception of platinum, gemstones, and magic items, which can sometimes be retrieved from the creature's gizzard after death.




              There's no reason your mimic couldn't have something similar, though I suppose it's not really explicitly spelled out as a common mimic characteristic.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                Purely out of morbid curiosity - can you a cite a published adventure that has that? And do players have to specifically say they're searching inside it?
                $endgroup$
                – NautArch
                Mar 7 at 17:11






              • 3




                $begingroup$
                "common in published adventures", "the monster's manual even suggests" your answer would be much more convincing if you found examples and provided some or citations to back up these claims. It is important that answers are backed up properly as we require on this site.
                $endgroup$
                – Rubiksmoose
                Mar 7 at 17:12







              • 2




                $begingroup$
                @NautArch It happens a few times in Tales from the Yawning Portal. Players do have to explicitly state that they're searching the gizzard.
                $endgroup$
                – kyle sexton
                Mar 7 at 17:44






              • 5




                $begingroup$
                @kylesexton Actually, we are allowed to do so. If you post sections of sources (not like the whole thing obviously) here that is well within the norm here and is perfectly fine. In fact, doing so is encouraged. Again not the whole thing, but just whatever part is needed to make your point.
                $endgroup$
                – Rubiksmoose
                Mar 7 at 17:45







              • 2




                $begingroup$
                The quote seems to indicate that only platinum, gemstones, and magic items can be retrieved from a roper's guts. That is, other "loot" including lesser metals like gold and silver, won't be present as they'd be digested. It seems to me that this indicates that should anything be found, it would be relatively rare or valuable compared to a chest or other loot source.
                $endgroup$
                – Roddy of the Frozen Peas
                Mar 8 at 2:22















              13












              $begingroup$

              It's fairly common in published adventures for e.g. a roper to have loot in its gizzard. It occurs multiple times in Tales from the Yawning Portal.



              The monster's manual even suggests treasure winds up there. From page 261.




              A roper can digest anything it eats with the exception of platinum, gemstones, and magic items, which can sometimes be retrieved from the creature's gizzard after death.




              There's no reason your mimic couldn't have something similar, though I suppose it's not really explicitly spelled out as a common mimic characteristic.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                Purely out of morbid curiosity - can you a cite a published adventure that has that? And do players have to specifically say they're searching inside it?
                $endgroup$
                – NautArch
                Mar 7 at 17:11






              • 3




                $begingroup$
                "common in published adventures", "the monster's manual even suggests" your answer would be much more convincing if you found examples and provided some or citations to back up these claims. It is important that answers are backed up properly as we require on this site.
                $endgroup$
                – Rubiksmoose
                Mar 7 at 17:12







              • 2




                $begingroup$
                @NautArch It happens a few times in Tales from the Yawning Portal. Players do have to explicitly state that they're searching the gizzard.
                $endgroup$
                – kyle sexton
                Mar 7 at 17:44






              • 5




                $begingroup$
                @kylesexton Actually, we are allowed to do so. If you post sections of sources (not like the whole thing obviously) here that is well within the norm here and is perfectly fine. In fact, doing so is encouraged. Again not the whole thing, but just whatever part is needed to make your point.
                $endgroup$
                – Rubiksmoose
                Mar 7 at 17:45







              • 2




                $begingroup$
                The quote seems to indicate that only platinum, gemstones, and magic items can be retrieved from a roper's guts. That is, other "loot" including lesser metals like gold and silver, won't be present as they'd be digested. It seems to me that this indicates that should anything be found, it would be relatively rare or valuable compared to a chest or other loot source.
                $endgroup$
                – Roddy of the Frozen Peas
                Mar 8 at 2:22













              13












              13








              13





              $begingroup$

              It's fairly common in published adventures for e.g. a roper to have loot in its gizzard. It occurs multiple times in Tales from the Yawning Portal.



              The monster's manual even suggests treasure winds up there. From page 261.




              A roper can digest anything it eats with the exception of platinum, gemstones, and magic items, which can sometimes be retrieved from the creature's gizzard after death.




              There's no reason your mimic couldn't have something similar, though I suppose it's not really explicitly spelled out as a common mimic characteristic.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              It's fairly common in published adventures for e.g. a roper to have loot in its gizzard. It occurs multiple times in Tales from the Yawning Portal.



              The monster's manual even suggests treasure winds up there. From page 261.




              A roper can digest anything it eats with the exception of platinum, gemstones, and magic items, which can sometimes be retrieved from the creature's gizzard after death.




              There's no reason your mimic couldn't have something similar, though I suppose it's not really explicitly spelled out as a common mimic characteristic.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Mar 7 at 18:14

























              answered Mar 7 at 17:06









              kyle sextonkyle sexton

              36713




              36713











              • $begingroup$
                Purely out of morbid curiosity - can you a cite a published adventure that has that? And do players have to specifically say they're searching inside it?
                $endgroup$
                – NautArch
                Mar 7 at 17:11






              • 3




                $begingroup$
                "common in published adventures", "the monster's manual even suggests" your answer would be much more convincing if you found examples and provided some or citations to back up these claims. It is important that answers are backed up properly as we require on this site.
                $endgroup$
                – Rubiksmoose
                Mar 7 at 17:12







              • 2




                $begingroup$
                @NautArch It happens a few times in Tales from the Yawning Portal. Players do have to explicitly state that they're searching the gizzard.
                $endgroup$
                – kyle sexton
                Mar 7 at 17:44






              • 5




                $begingroup$
                @kylesexton Actually, we are allowed to do so. If you post sections of sources (not like the whole thing obviously) here that is well within the norm here and is perfectly fine. In fact, doing so is encouraged. Again not the whole thing, but just whatever part is needed to make your point.
                $endgroup$
                – Rubiksmoose
                Mar 7 at 17:45







              • 2




                $begingroup$
                The quote seems to indicate that only platinum, gemstones, and magic items can be retrieved from a roper's guts. That is, other "loot" including lesser metals like gold and silver, won't be present as they'd be digested. It seems to me that this indicates that should anything be found, it would be relatively rare or valuable compared to a chest or other loot source.
                $endgroup$
                – Roddy of the Frozen Peas
                Mar 8 at 2:22
















              • $begingroup$
                Purely out of morbid curiosity - can you a cite a published adventure that has that? And do players have to specifically say they're searching inside it?
                $endgroup$
                – NautArch
                Mar 7 at 17:11






              • 3




                $begingroup$
                "common in published adventures", "the monster's manual even suggests" your answer would be much more convincing if you found examples and provided some or citations to back up these claims. It is important that answers are backed up properly as we require on this site.
                $endgroup$
                – Rubiksmoose
                Mar 7 at 17:12







              • 2




                $begingroup$
                @NautArch It happens a few times in Tales from the Yawning Portal. Players do have to explicitly state that they're searching the gizzard.
                $endgroup$
                – kyle sexton
                Mar 7 at 17:44






              • 5




                $begingroup$
                @kylesexton Actually, we are allowed to do so. If you post sections of sources (not like the whole thing obviously) here that is well within the norm here and is perfectly fine. In fact, doing so is encouraged. Again not the whole thing, but just whatever part is needed to make your point.
                $endgroup$
                – Rubiksmoose
                Mar 7 at 17:45







              • 2




                $begingroup$
                The quote seems to indicate that only platinum, gemstones, and magic items can be retrieved from a roper's guts. That is, other "loot" including lesser metals like gold and silver, won't be present as they'd be digested. It seems to me that this indicates that should anything be found, it would be relatively rare or valuable compared to a chest or other loot source.
                $endgroup$
                – Roddy of the Frozen Peas
                Mar 8 at 2:22















              $begingroup$
              Purely out of morbid curiosity - can you a cite a published adventure that has that? And do players have to specifically say they're searching inside it?
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              Mar 7 at 17:11




              $begingroup$
              Purely out of morbid curiosity - can you a cite a published adventure that has that? And do players have to specifically say they're searching inside it?
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              Mar 7 at 17:11




              3




              3




              $begingroup$
              "common in published adventures", "the monster's manual even suggests" your answer would be much more convincing if you found examples and provided some or citations to back up these claims. It is important that answers are backed up properly as we require on this site.
              $endgroup$
              – Rubiksmoose
              Mar 7 at 17:12





              $begingroup$
              "common in published adventures", "the monster's manual even suggests" your answer would be much more convincing if you found examples and provided some or citations to back up these claims. It is important that answers are backed up properly as we require on this site.
              $endgroup$
              – Rubiksmoose
              Mar 7 at 17:12





              2




              2




              $begingroup$
              @NautArch It happens a few times in Tales from the Yawning Portal. Players do have to explicitly state that they're searching the gizzard.
              $endgroup$
              – kyle sexton
              Mar 7 at 17:44




              $begingroup$
              @NautArch It happens a few times in Tales from the Yawning Portal. Players do have to explicitly state that they're searching the gizzard.
              $endgroup$
              – kyle sexton
              Mar 7 at 17:44




              5




              5




              $begingroup$
              @kylesexton Actually, we are allowed to do so. If you post sections of sources (not like the whole thing obviously) here that is well within the norm here and is perfectly fine. In fact, doing so is encouraged. Again not the whole thing, but just whatever part is needed to make your point.
              $endgroup$
              – Rubiksmoose
              Mar 7 at 17:45





              $begingroup$
              @kylesexton Actually, we are allowed to do so. If you post sections of sources (not like the whole thing obviously) here that is well within the norm here and is perfectly fine. In fact, doing so is encouraged. Again not the whole thing, but just whatever part is needed to make your point.
              $endgroup$
              – Rubiksmoose
              Mar 7 at 17:45





              2




              2




              $begingroup$
              The quote seems to indicate that only platinum, gemstones, and magic items can be retrieved from a roper's guts. That is, other "loot" including lesser metals like gold and silver, won't be present as they'd be digested. It seems to me that this indicates that should anything be found, it would be relatively rare or valuable compared to a chest or other loot source.
              $endgroup$
              – Roddy of the Frozen Peas
              Mar 8 at 2:22




              $begingroup$
              The quote seems to indicate that only platinum, gemstones, and magic items can be retrieved from a roper's guts. That is, other "loot" including lesser metals like gold and silver, won't be present as they'd be digested. It seems to me that this indicates that should anything be found, it would be relatively rare or valuable compared to a chest or other loot source.
              $endgroup$
              – Roddy of the Frozen Peas
              Mar 8 at 2:22











              7












              $begingroup$

              Probably not



              Because the mimic has the always on property of Adhesive when in object form:




              The mimic adheres to anything that touches it.




              It seems unlikely that someone was able to get something inside of it. Once it moves, it's no longer the object and is instead it's true form. And I'd saying that it opening is it moving (because it's moving.)



              However, should whomever is using it want to store something inside it (cruel!), I'm not sure that would be totally against the rules.



              Storing items inside creatures



              I guess technically it can 'contain' the item - but the players are going to have to 'dig' for it.



              The mimic is only an object when it's using it's shapechanger ability (my emphasis):




              The mimic can use its action to polymorph into an object or back into its true, amorphous form. Its statistics are the same in each form. Any equipment it is wearing or carrying isn't transformed. It reverts to its true form if it dies.




              If they've killed it, then it's no longer acting as the 'container', but I don't see why it can't still have something inside it (heck, any monster could have items implanted, I guess.)






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                7












                $begingroup$

                Probably not



                Because the mimic has the always on property of Adhesive when in object form:




                The mimic adheres to anything that touches it.




                It seems unlikely that someone was able to get something inside of it. Once it moves, it's no longer the object and is instead it's true form. And I'd saying that it opening is it moving (because it's moving.)



                However, should whomever is using it want to store something inside it (cruel!), I'm not sure that would be totally against the rules.



                Storing items inside creatures



                I guess technically it can 'contain' the item - but the players are going to have to 'dig' for it.



                The mimic is only an object when it's using it's shapechanger ability (my emphasis):




                The mimic can use its action to polymorph into an object or back into its true, amorphous form. Its statistics are the same in each form. Any equipment it is wearing or carrying isn't transformed. It reverts to its true form if it dies.




                If they've killed it, then it's no longer acting as the 'container', but I don't see why it can't still have something inside it (heck, any monster could have items implanted, I guess.)






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  7












                  7








                  7





                  $begingroup$

                  Probably not



                  Because the mimic has the always on property of Adhesive when in object form:




                  The mimic adheres to anything that touches it.




                  It seems unlikely that someone was able to get something inside of it. Once it moves, it's no longer the object and is instead it's true form. And I'd saying that it opening is it moving (because it's moving.)



                  However, should whomever is using it want to store something inside it (cruel!), I'm not sure that would be totally against the rules.



                  Storing items inside creatures



                  I guess technically it can 'contain' the item - but the players are going to have to 'dig' for it.



                  The mimic is only an object when it's using it's shapechanger ability (my emphasis):




                  The mimic can use its action to polymorph into an object or back into its true, amorphous form. Its statistics are the same in each form. Any equipment it is wearing or carrying isn't transformed. It reverts to its true form if it dies.




                  If they've killed it, then it's no longer acting as the 'container', but I don't see why it can't still have something inside it (heck, any monster could have items implanted, I guess.)






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Probably not



                  Because the mimic has the always on property of Adhesive when in object form:




                  The mimic adheres to anything that touches it.




                  It seems unlikely that someone was able to get something inside of it. Once it moves, it's no longer the object and is instead it's true form. And I'd saying that it opening is it moving (because it's moving.)



                  However, should whomever is using it want to store something inside it (cruel!), I'm not sure that would be totally against the rules.



                  Storing items inside creatures



                  I guess technically it can 'contain' the item - but the players are going to have to 'dig' for it.



                  The mimic is only an object when it's using it's shapechanger ability (my emphasis):




                  The mimic can use its action to polymorph into an object or back into its true, amorphous form. Its statistics are the same in each form. Any equipment it is wearing or carrying isn't transformed. It reverts to its true form if it dies.




                  If they've killed it, then it's no longer acting as the 'container', but I don't see why it can't still have something inside it (heck, any monster could have items implanted, I guess.)







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 7 at 16:58









                  NautArchNautArch

                  61.4k8220407




                  61.4k8220407





















                      4












                      $begingroup$

                      As a container, no.



                      When the mimic dies, it reverts into it's true shape, which is not a container which would normally contain loot. It could have eaten something like an enchanted ring by mistake or something while feasting on the poor adventurer before you, but otherwise, I think it would be on the outside of the Mimic due to its Adhesive property. Now, other monsters do have the ability to have loot inside them, as @kyle sexton has said, like the Roper, which is actually stated in the MM:




                      A roper can digest anything it eats with the exception of platinum, gemstones, and magic items, which can sometimes be retrieved from the creature’s gizzard after death. A roper’s digestive juices are also valuable, fetching a high price from alchemists who use them as a solvent.




                      Then you have the Purple Worm which eats through the earth, and can have gems and the like inside its stomach, which is also referenced in the MM:




                      When a purple worm burrows through the ground, it consumes earth and rock, which it breaks down and constantly excretes. Precious metals and gems can thus be found within the bodies of purple worms, which are targeted by particularly brave and foolhardy treasure hunters.




                      So... For the mimic, I would think not, but as DM, you could rule it so. Other monsters consume things that they cannot digest and you can loot them for it, so why not the mimic?






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$

















                        4












                        $begingroup$

                        As a container, no.



                        When the mimic dies, it reverts into it's true shape, which is not a container which would normally contain loot. It could have eaten something like an enchanted ring by mistake or something while feasting on the poor adventurer before you, but otherwise, I think it would be on the outside of the Mimic due to its Adhesive property. Now, other monsters do have the ability to have loot inside them, as @kyle sexton has said, like the Roper, which is actually stated in the MM:




                        A roper can digest anything it eats with the exception of platinum, gemstones, and magic items, which can sometimes be retrieved from the creature’s gizzard after death. A roper’s digestive juices are also valuable, fetching a high price from alchemists who use them as a solvent.




                        Then you have the Purple Worm which eats through the earth, and can have gems and the like inside its stomach, which is also referenced in the MM:




                        When a purple worm burrows through the ground, it consumes earth and rock, which it breaks down and constantly excretes. Precious metals and gems can thus be found within the bodies of purple worms, which are targeted by particularly brave and foolhardy treasure hunters.




                        So... For the mimic, I would think not, but as DM, you could rule it so. Other monsters consume things that they cannot digest and you can loot them for it, so why not the mimic?






                        share|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$















                          4












                          4








                          4





                          $begingroup$

                          As a container, no.



                          When the mimic dies, it reverts into it's true shape, which is not a container which would normally contain loot. It could have eaten something like an enchanted ring by mistake or something while feasting on the poor adventurer before you, but otherwise, I think it would be on the outside of the Mimic due to its Adhesive property. Now, other monsters do have the ability to have loot inside them, as @kyle sexton has said, like the Roper, which is actually stated in the MM:




                          A roper can digest anything it eats with the exception of platinum, gemstones, and magic items, which can sometimes be retrieved from the creature’s gizzard after death. A roper’s digestive juices are also valuable, fetching a high price from alchemists who use them as a solvent.




                          Then you have the Purple Worm which eats through the earth, and can have gems and the like inside its stomach, which is also referenced in the MM:




                          When a purple worm burrows through the ground, it consumes earth and rock, which it breaks down and constantly excretes. Precious metals and gems can thus be found within the bodies of purple worms, which are targeted by particularly brave and foolhardy treasure hunters.




                          So... For the mimic, I would think not, but as DM, you could rule it so. Other monsters consume things that they cannot digest and you can loot them for it, so why not the mimic?






                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          As a container, no.



                          When the mimic dies, it reverts into it's true shape, which is not a container which would normally contain loot. It could have eaten something like an enchanted ring by mistake or something while feasting on the poor adventurer before you, but otherwise, I think it would be on the outside of the Mimic due to its Adhesive property. Now, other monsters do have the ability to have loot inside them, as @kyle sexton has said, like the Roper, which is actually stated in the MM:




                          A roper can digest anything it eats with the exception of platinum, gemstones, and magic items, which can sometimes be retrieved from the creature’s gizzard after death. A roper’s digestive juices are also valuable, fetching a high price from alchemists who use them as a solvent.




                          Then you have the Purple Worm which eats through the earth, and can have gems and the like inside its stomach, which is also referenced in the MM:




                          When a purple worm burrows through the ground, it consumes earth and rock, which it breaks down and constantly excretes. Precious metals and gems can thus be found within the bodies of purple worms, which are targeted by particularly brave and foolhardy treasure hunters.




                          So... For the mimic, I would think not, but as DM, you could rule it so. Other monsters consume things that they cannot digest and you can loot them for it, so why not the mimic?







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited Mar 7 at 19:05









                          V2Blast

                          26k589159




                          26k589159










                          answered Mar 7 at 17:36









                          BookwyrmBookwyrm

                          563417




                          563417



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142663%2fcan-a-mimic-container-form-actually-hold-loot%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              1928 у кіно

                              Захаров Федір Захарович

                              Ель Греко