completing tables in paired designs with missing levels The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) The Ask Question Wizard is Live! Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experienceDrop factor levels in a subsetted data frameQuickly reading very large tables as dataframesElegant way to check for missing packages and install them?Remove rows with all or some NAs (missing values) in data.frameTools for making latex tables in Rrbindlist for factors with missing levelsR: zero padding for missing levels in group-by tablemissing factor level in RHow to complete missing factor levels in data frame?Filling missing levels
Can the DM override racial traits?
How to split my screen on my Macbook Air?
Who or what is the being for whom Being is a question for Heidegger?
What are these Gizmos at Izaña Atmospheric Research Center in Spain?
University's motivation for having tenure-track positions
Change bounding box of math glyphs in LuaTeX
Sort a list of pairs representing an acyclic, partial automorphism
If the empty set is a subset of every set, why write ... ∪ ∅?
Why did all the guest students take carriages to the Yule Ball?
Take groceries in checked luggage
Can a novice safely splice in wire to lengthen 5V charging cable?
Create an outline of font
Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?
Make it rain characters
Semisimplicity of the category of coherent sheaves?
What aspect of planet Earth must be changed to prevent the industrial revolution?
How does ice melt when immersed in water?
The variadic template constructor of my class cannot modify my class members, why is that so?
Wall plug outlet change
Simulating Exploding Dice
Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?
how can a perfect fourth interval be considered either consonant or dissonant?
Scientific Reports - Significant Figures
Why is superheterodyning better than direct conversion?
completing tables in paired designs with missing levels
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experienceDrop factor levels in a subsetted data frameQuickly reading very large tables as dataframesElegant way to check for missing packages and install them?Remove rows with all or some NAs (missing values) in data.frameTools for making latex tables in Rrbindlist for factors with missing levelsR: zero padding for missing levels in group-by tablemissing factor level in RHow to complete missing factor levels in data frame?Filling missing levels
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I have a repeated measures design with categorical variables. Let's say, participants reported their attitude ('Approve', 'Neutral', 'Disapprove') at time point 1 and 2. I then create a table with frequencies of response combinations.
# setup
set.seed(123)
library(tidyverse)
# made-up data
survey.data <- data.frame(
`1st survey` = c('Approve', 'Approve', 'Neutral', 'Approve'),
`2nd survey` = c('Approve', 'Disapprove', 'Approve', 'Neutral'),
`Counts` = c(79, 15, 86, 10),
check.names = FALSE
) %>%
tidyr::uncount(., Counts) %>%
tibble::as_tibble()
# table of counts
table("1" = survey.data$`1st survey`, "2" = survey.data$`2nd survey`)
#> 2
#> 1 Approve Disapprove Neutral
#> Approve 79 15 10
#> Neutral 86 0 0
Note here that since nobody chose the option "Disapprove"
at time point-1, it is missing from the table. This is, of course, expected. But the function I want to use (rcompanion::cohenG
) expects an equal number of rows and columns in a table. So I was wondering how I can change the code above to get the expected output here-
#> 2
#> 1 Approve Disapprove Neutral
#> Approve 79 15 10
#> Disapprove 0 0 0
#> Neutral 86 0 0
r
add a comment |
I have a repeated measures design with categorical variables. Let's say, participants reported their attitude ('Approve', 'Neutral', 'Disapprove') at time point 1 and 2. I then create a table with frequencies of response combinations.
# setup
set.seed(123)
library(tidyverse)
# made-up data
survey.data <- data.frame(
`1st survey` = c('Approve', 'Approve', 'Neutral', 'Approve'),
`2nd survey` = c('Approve', 'Disapprove', 'Approve', 'Neutral'),
`Counts` = c(79, 15, 86, 10),
check.names = FALSE
) %>%
tidyr::uncount(., Counts) %>%
tibble::as_tibble()
# table of counts
table("1" = survey.data$`1st survey`, "2" = survey.data$`2nd survey`)
#> 2
#> 1 Approve Disapprove Neutral
#> Approve 79 15 10
#> Neutral 86 0 0
Note here that since nobody chose the option "Disapprove"
at time point-1, it is missing from the table. This is, of course, expected. But the function I want to use (rcompanion::cohenG
) expects an equal number of rows and columns in a table. So I was wondering how I can change the code above to get the expected output here-
#> 2
#> 1 Approve Disapprove Neutral
#> Approve 79 15 10
#> Disapprove 0 0 0
#> Neutral 86 0 0
r
add a comment |
I have a repeated measures design with categorical variables. Let's say, participants reported their attitude ('Approve', 'Neutral', 'Disapprove') at time point 1 and 2. I then create a table with frequencies of response combinations.
# setup
set.seed(123)
library(tidyverse)
# made-up data
survey.data <- data.frame(
`1st survey` = c('Approve', 'Approve', 'Neutral', 'Approve'),
`2nd survey` = c('Approve', 'Disapprove', 'Approve', 'Neutral'),
`Counts` = c(79, 15, 86, 10),
check.names = FALSE
) %>%
tidyr::uncount(., Counts) %>%
tibble::as_tibble()
# table of counts
table("1" = survey.data$`1st survey`, "2" = survey.data$`2nd survey`)
#> 2
#> 1 Approve Disapprove Neutral
#> Approve 79 15 10
#> Neutral 86 0 0
Note here that since nobody chose the option "Disapprove"
at time point-1, it is missing from the table. This is, of course, expected. But the function I want to use (rcompanion::cohenG
) expects an equal number of rows and columns in a table. So I was wondering how I can change the code above to get the expected output here-
#> 2
#> 1 Approve Disapprove Neutral
#> Approve 79 15 10
#> Disapprove 0 0 0
#> Neutral 86 0 0
r
I have a repeated measures design with categorical variables. Let's say, participants reported their attitude ('Approve', 'Neutral', 'Disapprove') at time point 1 and 2. I then create a table with frequencies of response combinations.
# setup
set.seed(123)
library(tidyverse)
# made-up data
survey.data <- data.frame(
`1st survey` = c('Approve', 'Approve', 'Neutral', 'Approve'),
`2nd survey` = c('Approve', 'Disapprove', 'Approve', 'Neutral'),
`Counts` = c(79, 15, 86, 10),
check.names = FALSE
) %>%
tidyr::uncount(., Counts) %>%
tibble::as_tibble()
# table of counts
table("1" = survey.data$`1st survey`, "2" = survey.data$`2nd survey`)
#> 2
#> 1 Approve Disapprove Neutral
#> Approve 79 15 10
#> Neutral 86 0 0
Note here that since nobody chose the option "Disapprove"
at time point-1, it is missing from the table. This is, of course, expected. But the function I want to use (rcompanion::cohenG
) expects an equal number of rows and columns in a table. So I was wondering how I can change the code above to get the expected output here-
#> 2
#> 1 Approve Disapprove Neutral
#> Approve 79 15 10
#> Disapprove 0 0 0
#> Neutral 86 0 0
r
r
asked Mar 8 at 13:35
Indrajeet PatilIndrajeet Patil
1,609414
1,609414
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You can cast the responses to factors with three known levels
levels <- c("Disapprove", "Neutral", "Approve")
survey.data <- survey.data %>%
mutate_at(vars(`1st survey`,
`2nd survey`),
factor, levels = levels)
table(survey.data$`1st survey`,
survey.data$`2nd survey`)
#>
#> Disapprove Neutral Approve
#> Disapprove 0 0 0
#> Neutral 0 0 86
#> Approve 15 10 79
Created on 2019-03-08 by the reprex package (v0.2.1)
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55064325%2fcompleting-tables-in-paired-designs-with-missing-levels%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can cast the responses to factors with three known levels
levels <- c("Disapprove", "Neutral", "Approve")
survey.data <- survey.data %>%
mutate_at(vars(`1st survey`,
`2nd survey`),
factor, levels = levels)
table(survey.data$`1st survey`,
survey.data$`2nd survey`)
#>
#> Disapprove Neutral Approve
#> Disapprove 0 0 0
#> Neutral 0 0 86
#> Approve 15 10 79
Created on 2019-03-08 by the reprex package (v0.2.1)
add a comment |
You can cast the responses to factors with three known levels
levels <- c("Disapprove", "Neutral", "Approve")
survey.data <- survey.data %>%
mutate_at(vars(`1st survey`,
`2nd survey`),
factor, levels = levels)
table(survey.data$`1st survey`,
survey.data$`2nd survey`)
#>
#> Disapprove Neutral Approve
#> Disapprove 0 0 0
#> Neutral 0 0 86
#> Approve 15 10 79
Created on 2019-03-08 by the reprex package (v0.2.1)
add a comment |
You can cast the responses to factors with three known levels
levels <- c("Disapprove", "Neutral", "Approve")
survey.data <- survey.data %>%
mutate_at(vars(`1st survey`,
`2nd survey`),
factor, levels = levels)
table(survey.data$`1st survey`,
survey.data$`2nd survey`)
#>
#> Disapprove Neutral Approve
#> Disapprove 0 0 0
#> Neutral 0 0 86
#> Approve 15 10 79
Created on 2019-03-08 by the reprex package (v0.2.1)
You can cast the responses to factors with three known levels
levels <- c("Disapprove", "Neutral", "Approve")
survey.data <- survey.data %>%
mutate_at(vars(`1st survey`,
`2nd survey`),
factor, levels = levels)
table(survey.data$`1st survey`,
survey.data$`2nd survey`)
#>
#> Disapprove Neutral Approve
#> Disapprove 0 0 0
#> Neutral 0 0 86
#> Approve 15 10 79
Created on 2019-03-08 by the reprex package (v0.2.1)
answered Mar 8 at 13:52
dipetkovdipetkov
1,48618
1,48618
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55064325%2fcompleting-tables-in-paired-designs-with-missing-levels%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown